GRANVILLE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

144

35%

LEVEL 2

139

33%

LEVEL 3

99

24%

LEVEL 4

34

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

132
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 431

LEVEL 1

138

32%

LEVEL 2

161

37%

LEVEL 3

95

22%

LEVEL 4

37

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

65
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

60

31%

LEVEL 2

66

35%

LEVEL 3

50

26%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

62

31%

LEVEL 2

77

39%

LEVEL 3

45

23%

LEVEL 4

16

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

68
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

84

37%

LEVEL 2

73

32%

LEVEL 3

49

22%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

71
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

76

33%

LEVEL 2

84

36%

LEVEL 3

50

22%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

5

38%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

5

38%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

7

41%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

6

35%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

123
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

133

34%

LEVEL 2

133

34%

LEVEL 3

91

23%

LEVEL 4

32

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

124
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 401

LEVEL 1

126

31%

LEVEL 2

151

38%

LEVEL 3

88

22%

LEVEL 4

36

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

97

28%

LEVEL 2

130

37%

LEVEL 3

92

26%

LEVEL 4

32

9%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

126
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

84

24%

LEVEL 2

144

41%

LEVEL 3

92

26%

LEVEL 4

34

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

47

72%

LEVEL 2

9

14%

LEVEL 3

7

11%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

54

70%

LEVEL 2

17

22%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

40

23%

LEVEL 2

64

37%

LEVEL 3

48

28%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

68
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

51

27%

LEVEL 2

71

37%

LEVEL 3

50

26%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

104

42%

LEVEL 2

75

31%

LEVEL 3

51

21%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

87

36%

LEVEL 2

90

37%

LEVEL 3

45

19%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

132
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

142

35%

LEVEL 2

137

33%

LEVEL 3

98

24%

LEVEL 4

34

8%

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

131
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

138

34%

LEVEL 2

138

34%

LEVEL 3

97

24%

LEVEL 4

34

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

129
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 415

LEVEL 1

127

31%

LEVEL 2

159

38%

LEVEL 3

93

22%

LEVEL 4

36

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

6

67%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

11

69%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.