Skip to Content
Main content

ELLENVILLE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

118
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 570

LEVEL 1

314

55%

LEVEL 2

138

24%

LEVEL 3

92

16%

LEVEL 4

26

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

151
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 573

LEVEL 1

277

48%

LEVEL 2

145

25%

LEVEL 3

107

19%

LEVEL 4

44

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

62
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

129

48%

LEVEL 2

76

28%

LEVEL 3

49

18%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

124

46%

LEVEL 2

73

27%

LEVEL 3

53

20%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

185

61%

LEVEL 2

62

20%

LEVEL 3

43

14%

LEVEL 4

13

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

153

51%

LEVEL 2

72

24%

LEVEL 3

54

18%

LEVEL 4

23

8%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

13

57%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

4

17%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

13

48%

LEVEL 2

7

26%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

63
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 234

LEVEL 1

109

47%

LEVEL 2

62

26%

LEVEL 3

47

20%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

81
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

97

40%

LEVEL 2

62

26%

LEVEL 3

52

22%

LEVEL 4

29

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

35

66%

LEVEL 2

16

30%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

32

59%

LEVEL 2

16

30%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

41
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

149

61%

LEVEL 2

53

22%

LEVEL 3

34

14%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

52
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

132

54%

LEVEL 2

59

24%

LEVEL 3

42

17%

LEVEL 4

10

4%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

215

47%

LEVEL 2

130

28%

LEVEL 3

91

20%

LEVEL 4

26

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

143
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 456

LEVEL 1

177

39%

LEVEL 2

136

30%

LEVEL 3

99

22%

LEVEL 4

44

10%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

99

92%

LEVEL 2

8

7%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

100

85%

LEVEL 2

9

8%

LEVEL 3

8

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

117
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 538

LEVEL 1

288

54%

LEVEL 2

133

25%

LEVEL 3

91

17%

LEVEL 4

26

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

146
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 541

LEVEL 1

257

48%

LEVEL 2

138

26%

LEVEL 3

103

19%

LEVEL 4

43

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

26

81%

LEVEL 2

5

16%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

20

63%

LEVEL 2

7

22%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

61

42%

LEVEL 2

34

24%

LEVEL 3

36

25%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

59

39%

LEVEL 2

35

23%

LEVEL 3

35

23%

LEVEL 4

22

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

253

59%

LEVEL 2

104

24%

LEVEL 3

56

13%

LEVEL 4

13

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

94
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

218

52%

LEVEL 2

110

26%

LEVEL 3

72

17%

LEVEL 4

22

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

116
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 549

LEVEL 1

300

55%

LEVEL 2

133

24%

LEVEL 3

91

17%

LEVEL 4

25

5%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

146
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 547

LEVEL 1

263

48%

LEVEL 2

138

25%

LEVEL 3

103

19%

LEVEL 4

43

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

14

67%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

14

54%

LEVEL 2

7

27%

LEVEL 3

4

15%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.