WALLKILL CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

303
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 713

LEVEL 1

193

27%

LEVEL 2

217

30%

LEVEL 3

211

30%

LEVEL 4

92

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

372
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 767

LEVEL 1

174

23%

LEVEL 2

221

29%

LEVEL 3

243

32%

LEVEL 4

129

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

145
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 319

LEVEL 1

75

24%

LEVEL 2

99

31%

LEVEL 3

101

32%

LEVEL 4

44

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

167
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

82

24%

LEVEL 2

88

26%

LEVEL 3

111

33%

LEVEL 4

56

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

158
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

118

30%

LEVEL 2

118

30%

LEVEL 3

110

28%

LEVEL 4

48

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

205
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

92

21%

LEVEL 2

133

31%

LEVEL 3

132

31%

LEVEL 4

73

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

3

19%

LEVEL 2

7

44%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

7

30%

LEVEL 2

9

39%

LEVEL 3

5

22%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

219
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 454

LEVEL 1

106

23%

LEVEL 2

129

28%

LEVEL 3

153

34%

LEVEL 4

66

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

253
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 473

LEVEL 1

95

20%

LEVEL 2

125

26%

LEVEL 3

162

34%

LEVEL 4

91

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

21

41%

LEVEL 2

17

33%

LEVEL 3

7

14%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

21

34%

LEVEL 2

24

39%

LEVEL 3

11

18%

LEVEL 4

6

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

54
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

61

34%

LEVEL 2

62

35%

LEVEL 3

41

23%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

84
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

50

26%

LEVEL 2

61

31%

LEVEL 3

59

30%

LEVEL 4

25

13%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

301
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 633

LEVEL 1

127

20%

LEVEL 2

205

32%

LEVEL 3

210

33%

LEVEL 4

91

14%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

365
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 674

LEVEL 1

104

15%

LEVEL 2

205

30%

LEVEL 3

236

35%

LEVEL 4

129

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

66

83%

LEVEL 2

12

15%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

70

75%

LEVEL 2

16

17%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

300
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 698

LEVEL 1

184

26%

LEVEL 2

214

31%

LEVEL 3

208

30%

LEVEL 4

92

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

371
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 754

LEVEL 1

168

22%

LEVEL 2

215

29%

LEVEL 3

242

32%

LEVEL 4

129

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

9

60%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

230
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 440

LEVEL 1

76

17%

LEVEL 2

134

30%

LEVEL 3

152

35%

LEVEL 4

78

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

288
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 509

LEVEL 1

75

15%

LEVEL 2

146

29%

LEVEL 3

180

35%

LEVEL 4

108

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

117

43%

LEVEL 2

83

30%

LEVEL 3

59

22%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

99

38%

LEVEL 2

75

29%

LEVEL 3

63

24%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.