RONDOUT VALLEY CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

260
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 637

LEVEL 1

203

32%

LEVEL 2

174

27%

LEVEL 3

173

27%

LEVEL 4

87

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

251
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 676

LEVEL 1

224

33%

LEVEL 2

201

30%

LEVEL 3

158

23%

LEVEL 4

93

14%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

137
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

98

32%

LEVEL 2

72

23%

LEVEL 3

91

30%

LEVEL 4

46

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

124
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

125

37%

LEVEL 2

90

27%

LEVEL 3

83

24%

LEVEL 4

41

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

123
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

105

32%

LEVEL 2

102

31%

LEVEL 3

82

25%

LEVEL 4

41

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

127
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

99

29%

LEVEL 2

111

33%

LEVEL 3

75

22%

LEVEL 4

52

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

6

33%

LEVEL 2

2

11%

LEVEL 3

9

50%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

7

35%

LEVEL 2

3

15%

LEVEL 3

5

25%

LEVEL 4

5

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

224
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 533

LEVEL 1

165

31%

LEVEL 2

144

27%

LEVEL 3

148

28%

LEVEL 4

76

14%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

222
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 558

LEVEL 1

173

31%

LEVEL 2

163

29%

LEVEL 3

142

25%

LEVEL 4

80

14%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

7

29%

LEVEL 2

12

50%

LEVEL 3

5

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

20

67%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

23

42%

LEVEL 2

16

29%

LEVEL 3

9

16%

LEVEL 4

7

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

21

37%

LEVEL 2

24

42%

LEVEL 3

8

14%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

249
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 513

LEVEL 1

114

22%

LEVEL 2

150

29%

LEVEL 3

163

32%

LEVEL 4

86

17%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

241
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 542

LEVEL 1

123

23%

LEVEL 2

178

33%

LEVEL 3

151

28%

LEVEL 4

90

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

11
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

89

72%

LEVEL 2

24

19%

LEVEL 3

10

8%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

101

75%

LEVEL 2

23

17%

LEVEL 3

7

5%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

176
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

66

20%

LEVEL 2

91

27%

LEVEL 3

114

34%

LEVEL 4

62

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

178
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

69

20%

LEVEL 2

105

30%

LEVEL 3

107

30%

LEVEL 4

71

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

137

45%

LEVEL 2

83

27%

LEVEL 3

59

19%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

155

48%

LEVEL 2

96

30%

LEVEL 3

51

16%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

249
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 669

LEVEL 1

221

33%

LEVEL 2

199

30%

LEVEL 3

156

23%

LEVEL 4

93

14%

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

2
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

259
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 630

LEVEL 1

198

31%

LEVEL 2

173

27%

LEVEL 3

172

27%

LEVEL 4

87

14%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

251
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 669

LEVEL 1

219

33%

LEVEL 2

199

30%

LEVEL 3

158

24%

LEVEL 4

93

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.