HIGHLAND ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

44

18%

LEVEL 2

66

28%

LEVEL 3

90

38%

LEVEL 4

39

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 259

LEVEL 1

52

20%

LEVEL 2

79

31%

LEVEL 3

76

29%

LEVEL 4

52

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

18

16%

LEVEL 2

31

27%

LEVEL 3

49

42%

LEVEL 4

18

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

22

17%

LEVEL 2

40

32%

LEVEL 3

34

27%

LEVEL 4

30

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

26

21%

LEVEL 2

35

28%

LEVEL 3

41

33%

LEVEL 4

21

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

64
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

30

23%

LEVEL 2

39

29%

LEVEL 3

42

32%

LEVEL 4

22

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

8

62%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

8

50%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

8

62%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

6

60%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

93
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

20

13%

LEVEL 2

44

28%

LEVEL 3

63

40%

LEVEL 4

30

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

103
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

30

16%

LEVEL 2

49

27%

LEVEL 3

65

36%

LEVEL 4

38

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

7

39%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

4

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

7

41%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

14

37%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

11

29%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

11

32%

LEVEL 2

14

41%

LEVEL 3

6

18%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 212

LEVEL 1

22

10%

LEVEL 2

62

29%

LEVEL 3

89

42%

LEVEL 4

39

18%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

33

14%

LEVEL 2

73

31%

LEVEL 3

75

32%

LEVEL 4

52

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

22

81%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

19

73%

LEVEL 2

6

23%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

90
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

16

11%

LEVEL 2

40

27%

LEVEL 3

58

40%

LEVEL 4

32

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

95
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

18

12%

LEVEL 2

42

27%

LEVEL 3

52

34%

LEVEL 4

43

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

28

30%

LEVEL 2

26

28%

LEVEL 3

32

34%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

34

33%

LEVEL 2

37

36%

LEVEL 3

24

23%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

127
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

41

18%

LEVEL 2

65

28%

LEVEL 3

88

38%

LEVEL 4

39

17%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.