Skip to Content
Main content

M CLIFFORD MILLER MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 485

LEVEL 1

266

55%

LEVEL 2

129

27%

LEVEL 3

66

14%

LEVEL 4

24

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

133
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 622

LEVEL 1

341

55%

LEVEL 2

148

24%

LEVEL 3

99

16%

LEVEL 4

34

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

109

53%

LEVEL 2

59

29%

LEVEL 3

25

12%

LEVEL 4

13

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

59
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

153

54%

LEVEL 2

70

25%

LEVEL 3

45

16%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

157

56%

LEVEL 2

70

25%

LEVEL 3

41

15%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

74
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

188

55%

LEVEL 2

78

23%

LEVEL 3

54

16%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

23

62%

LEVEL 2

10

27%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

15
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

40

54%

LEVEL 2

19

26%

LEVEL 3

12

16%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

64
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

120

48%

LEVEL 2

66

26%

LEVEL 3

46

18%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

73
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 285

LEVEL 1

133

47%

LEVEL 2

79

28%

LEVEL 3

53

19%

LEVEL 4

20

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

62

82%

LEVEL 2

10

13%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

61

72%

LEVEL 2

17

20%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

57

53%

LEVEL 2

36

33%

LEVEL 3

13

12%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

26
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

103

65%

LEVEL 2

30

19%

LEVEL 3

21

13%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

141

42%

LEVEL 2

111

33%

LEVEL 3

62

18%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

130
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

181

41%

LEVEL 2

134

30%

LEVEL 3

96

22%

LEVEL 4

34

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 148

LEVEL 1

125

84%

LEVEL 2

18

12%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

160

90%

LEVEL 2

14

8%

LEVEL 3

3

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

90
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

245

53%

LEVEL 2

127

27%

LEVEL 3

66

14%

LEVEL 4

24

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

132
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 575

LEVEL 1

297

52%

LEVEL 2

146

25%

LEVEL 3

98

17%

LEVEL 4

34

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

21

91%

LEVEL 2

2

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

44

94%

LEVEL 2

2

4%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 139

LEVEL 1

45

32%

LEVEL 2

45

32%

LEVEL 3

36

26%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

63

37%

LEVEL 2

46

27%

LEVEL 3

44

26%

LEVEL 4

19

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

41
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

221

64%

LEVEL 2

84

24%

LEVEL 3

30

9%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

70
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

278

62%

LEVEL 2

102

23%

LEVEL 3

55

12%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

132
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 617

LEVEL 1

337

55%

LEVEL 2

148

24%

LEVEL 3

98

16%

LEVEL 4

34

6%

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

133
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 599

LEVEL 1

323

54%

LEVEL 2

143

24%

LEVEL 3

99

17%

LEVEL 4

34

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

18

78%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.