LANSING CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

279
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 499

LEVEL 1

99

20%

LEVEL 2

121

24%

LEVEL 3

160

32%

LEVEL 4

119

24%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

265
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 487

LEVEL 1

94

19%

LEVEL 2

128

26%

LEVEL 3

151

31%

LEVEL 4

114

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

124
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

39

17%

LEVEL 2

63

28%

LEVEL 3

76

34%

LEVEL 4

48

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

134
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

39

16%

LEVEL 2

68

28%

LEVEL 3

80

33%

LEVEL 4

54

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

155
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

60

22%

LEVEL 2

58

21%

LEVEL 3

84

31%

LEVEL 4

71

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

131
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

55

22%

LEVEL 2

60

24%

LEVEL 3

71

29%

LEVEL 4

60

24%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

27
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

14

25%

LEVEL 2

16

28%

LEVEL 3

17

30%

LEVEL 4

10

18%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

30
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

12

20%

LEVEL 2

19

31%

LEVEL 3

16

26%

LEVEL 4

14

23%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

1

7%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

4

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

231
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

77

19%

LEVEL 2

97

24%

LEVEL 3

129

32%

LEVEL 4

102

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

224
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

72

18%

LEVEL 2

102

26%

LEVEL 3

132

33%

LEVEL 4

92

23%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

2

12%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

9

53%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

5

42%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

273
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

56

13%

LEVEL 2

108

25%

LEVEL 3

155

35%

LEVEL 4

118

27%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

259
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

65

15%

LEVEL 2

112

26%

LEVEL 3

146

33%

LEVEL 4

113

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

43

69%

LEVEL 2

13

21%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

29

57%

LEVEL 2

16

31%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

279
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 493

LEVEL 1

95

19%

LEVEL 2

119

24%

LEVEL 3

160

32%

LEVEL 4

119

24%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

265
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 481

LEVEL 1

89

19%

LEVEL 2

127

26%

LEVEL 3

151

31%

LEVEL 4

114

24%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

230
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

37

10%

LEVEL 2

88

25%

LEVEL 3

129

36%

LEVEL 4

101

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

222
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

39

11%

LEVEL 2

88

25%

LEVEL 3

121

35%

LEVEL 4

101

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

49
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

62

43%

LEVEL 2

33

23%

LEVEL 3

31

22%

LEVEL 4

18

13%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

43
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

55

40%

LEVEL 2

40

29%

LEVEL 3

30

22%

LEVEL 4

13

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

262
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 482

LEVEL 1

94

20%

LEVEL 2

126

26%

LEVEL 3

150

31%

LEVEL 4

112

23%

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.