DRYDEN CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

228
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 571

LEVEL 1

194

34%

LEVEL 2

149

26%

LEVEL 3

137

24%

LEVEL 4

91

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

226
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 556

LEVEL 1

171

31%

LEVEL 2

159

29%

LEVEL 3

125

22%

LEVEL 4

101

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

100
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

85

32%

LEVEL 2

77

29%

LEVEL 3

59

23%

LEVEL 4

41

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

103
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

77

29%

LEVEL 2

85

32%

LEVEL 3

54

20%

LEVEL 4

49

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

128
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

109

35%

LEVEL 2

72

23%

LEVEL 3

78

25%

LEVEL 4

50

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

123
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

94

32%

LEVEL 2

74

25%

LEVEL 3

71

24%

LEVEL 4

52

18%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

17

45%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

11

34%

LEVEL 2

9

28%

LEVEL 3

5

16%

LEVEL 4

7

22%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

197
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 494

LEVEL 1

167

34%

LEVEL 2

130

26%

LEVEL 3

116

23%

LEVEL 4

81

16%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

199
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 485

LEVEL 1

144

30%

LEVEL 2

142

29%

LEVEL 3

113

23%

LEVEL 4

86

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

5

56%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

4

17%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

8

35%

LEVEL 4

4

17%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

8
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

8

38%

LEVEL 2

5

24%

LEVEL 3

4

19%

LEVEL 4

4

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

223
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 459

LEVEL 1

105

23%

LEVEL 2

131

29%

LEVEL 3

133

29%

LEVEL 4

90

20%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

218
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

80

18%

LEVEL 2

147

33%

LEVEL 3

119

27%

LEVEL 4

99

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

89

79%

LEVEL 2

18

16%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

91

82%

LEVEL 2

12

11%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

226
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 551

LEVEL 1

167

30%

LEVEL 2

158

29%

LEVEL 3

125

23%

LEVEL 4

101

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

154
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 283

LEVEL 1

51

18%

LEVEL 2

78

28%

LEVEL 3

82

29%

LEVEL 4

72

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

135
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

48

19%

LEVEL 2

67

27%

LEVEL 3

71

28%

LEVEL 4

64

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

143

50%

LEVEL 2

71

25%

LEVEL 3

55

19%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

123

40%

LEVEL 2

92

30%

LEVEL 3

54

18%

LEVEL 4

37

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

226
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 553

LEVEL 1

185

33%

LEVEL 2

142

26%

LEVEL 3

136

25%

LEVEL 4

90

16%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

226
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 546

LEVEL 1

164

30%

LEVEL 2

156

29%

LEVEL 3

125

23%

LEVEL 4

101

18%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

9

50%

LEVEL 2

7

39%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

7

70%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.