OWEGO-APALACHIN CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

356
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 737

LEVEL 1

191

26%

LEVEL 2

190

26%

LEVEL 3

198

27%

LEVEL 4

158

21%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

393
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 716

LEVEL 1

146

20%

LEVEL 2

177

25%

LEVEL 3

213

30%

LEVEL 4

180

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

164
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 348

LEVEL 1

87

25%

LEVEL 2

97

28%

LEVEL 3

93

27%

LEVEL 4

71

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

188
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

69

20%

LEVEL 2

83

24%

LEVEL 3

98

29%

LEVEL 4

90

26%

MALE

PROFICIENT

192
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

104

27%

LEVEL 2

93

24%

LEVEL 3

105

27%

LEVEL 4

87

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

205
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

77

20%

LEVEL 2

94

25%

LEVEL 3

115

31%

LEVEL 4

90

24%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

6

35%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

4

24%

LEVEL 4

3

18%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

4

24%

LEVEL 2

5

29%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

5

29%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

343
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 697

LEVEL 1

173

25%

LEVEL 2

181

26%

LEVEL 3

191

27%

LEVEL 4

152

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

378
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 674

LEVEL 1

132

20%

LEVEL 2

164

24%

LEVEL 3

207

31%

LEVEL 4

171

25%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

7

50%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

3

21%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

338
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 614

LEVEL 1

116

19%

LEVEL 2

160

26%

LEVEL 3

185

30%

LEVEL 4

153

25%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

378
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 608

LEVEL 1

84

14%

LEVEL 2

146

24%

LEVEL 3

202

33%

LEVEL 4

176

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

18
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

75

61%

LEVEL 2

30

24%

LEVEL 3

13

11%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

62

57%

LEVEL 2

31

29%

LEVEL 3

11

10%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

232
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

68

17%

LEVEL 2

104

26%

LEVEL 3

121

30%

LEVEL 4

111

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

269
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

52

13%

LEVEL 2

92

22%

LEVEL 3

138

33%

LEVEL 4

131

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

124
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 333

LEVEL 1

123

37%

LEVEL 2

86

26%

LEVEL 3

77

23%

LEVEL 4

47

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

124
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 303

LEVEL 1

94

31%

LEVEL 2

85

28%

LEVEL 3

75

25%

LEVEL 4

49

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

355
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 730

LEVEL 1

188

26%

LEVEL 2

187

26%

LEVEL 3

197

27%

LEVEL 4

158

22%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.