WAVERLY CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

198
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 596

LEVEL 1

229

38%

LEVEL 2

169

28%

LEVEL 3

121

20%

LEVEL 4

77

13%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

248
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 669

LEVEL 1

248

37%

LEVEL 2

173

26%

LEVEL 3

143

21%

LEVEL 4

105

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

89
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 300

LEVEL 1

116

39%

LEVEL 2

95

32%

LEVEL 3

60

20%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

113
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

117

37%

LEVEL 2

90

28%

LEVEL 3

68

21%

LEVEL 4

45

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

109
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 296

LEVEL 1

113

38%

LEVEL 2

74

25%

LEVEL 3

61

21%

LEVEL 4

48

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

135
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 349

LEVEL 1

131

38%

LEVEL 2

83

24%

LEVEL 3

75

21%

LEVEL 4

60

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

4

24%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

7

41%

LEVEL 4

3

18%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

193
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 579

LEVEL 1

225

39%

LEVEL 2

161

28%

LEVEL 3

117

20%

LEVEL 4

76

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

233
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 637

LEVEL 1

238

37%

LEVEL 2

166

26%

LEVEL 3

133

21%

LEVEL 4

100

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

190
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 496

LEVEL 1

148

30%

LEVEL 2

158

32%

LEVEL 3

115

23%

LEVEL 4

75

15%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

236
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 572

LEVEL 1

171

30%

LEVEL 2

165

29%

LEVEL 3

135

24%

LEVEL 4

101

18%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

81

81%

LEVEL 2

11

11%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

77

79%

LEVEL 2

8

8%

LEVEL 3

8

8%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

97
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

68

31%

LEVEL 2

56

25%

LEVEL 3

51

23%

LEVEL 4

46

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

136
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 279

LEVEL 1

78

28%

LEVEL 2

65

23%

LEVEL 3

71

25%

LEVEL 4

65

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

101
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

161

43%

LEVEL 2

113

30%

LEVEL 3

70

19%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

112
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 390

LEVEL 1

170

44%

LEVEL 2

108

28%

LEVEL 3

72

18%

LEVEL 4

40

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

196
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 591

LEVEL 1

227

38%

LEVEL 2

168

28%

LEVEL 3

119

20%

LEVEL 4

77

13%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.