SULLIVAN WEST CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

176
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

82

22%

LEVEL 2

113

30%

LEVEL 3

112

30%

LEVEL 4

64

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

155
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

111

29%

LEVEL 2

118

31%

LEVEL 3

94

24%

LEVEL 4

61

16%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

37

22%

LEVEL 2

55

32%

LEVEL 3

51

30%

LEVEL 4

29

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

48

26%

LEVEL 2

56

31%

LEVEL 3

52

29%

LEVEL 4

26

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

96
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

45

23%

LEVEL 2

58

29%

LEVEL 3

61

31%

LEVEL 4

35

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

63

31%

LEVEL 2

62

31%

LEVEL 3

42

21%

LEVEL 4

35

17%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

6

43%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

152
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

64

20%

LEVEL 2

99

31%

LEVEL 3

96

30%

LEVEL 4

56

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

138
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 328

LEVEL 1

93

28%

LEVEL 2

97

30%

LEVEL 3

86

26%

LEVEL 4

52

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

9

29%

LEVEL 2

10

32%

LEVEL 3

10

32%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

9

30%

LEVEL 2

12

40%

LEVEL 3

4

13%

LEVEL 4

5

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

171
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 317

LEVEL 1

46

15%

LEVEL 2

100

32%

LEVEL 3

107

34%

LEVEL 4

64

20%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

153
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

65

20%

LEVEL 2

106

33%

LEVEL 3

92

28%

LEVEL 4

61

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

36

67%

LEVEL 2

13

24%

LEVEL 3

5

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

46

77%

LEVEL 2

12

20%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

174
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 366

LEVEL 1

79

22%

LEVEL 2

113

31%

LEVEL 3

110

30%

LEVEL 4

64

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

155
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

107

28%

LEVEL 2

117

31%

LEVEL 3

94

25%

LEVEL 4

61

16%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

110
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

33

17%

LEVEL 2

57

29%

LEVEL 3

63

32%

LEVEL 4

47

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

91
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

45

23%

LEVEL 2

59

30%

LEVEL 3

51

26%

LEVEL 4

40

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

66
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 171

LEVEL 1

49

29%

LEVEL 2

56

33%

LEVEL 3

49

29%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

64
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 189

LEVEL 1

66

35%

LEVEL 2

59

31%

LEVEL 3

43

23%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.