GEORGE L COOKE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 250

LEVEL 1

112

45%

LEVEL 2

73

29%

LEVEL 3

43

17%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

123

45%

LEVEL 2

78

29%

LEVEL 3

54

20%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

33
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

59

47%

LEVEL 2

34

27%

LEVEL 3

22

17%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

27
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

60

47%

LEVEL 2

40

31%

LEVEL 3

22

17%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

53

43%

LEVEL 2

39

31%

LEVEL 3

21

17%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

43
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 144

LEVEL 1

63

44%

LEVEL 2

38

26%

LEVEL 3

32

22%

LEVEL 4

11

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

27
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

29

34%

LEVEL 2

30

35%

LEVEL 3

16

19%

LEVEL 4

11

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

33
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

33

36%

LEVEL 2

25

27%

LEVEL 3

23

25%

LEVEL 4

10

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

23

48%

LEVEL 2

14

29%

LEVEL 3

8

17%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

19

41%

LEVEL 2

18

39%

LEVEL 3

7

15%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

19
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

51

53%

LEVEL 2

26

27%

LEVEL 3

15

16%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

22
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 108

LEVEL 1

57

53%

LEVEL 2

29

27%

LEVEL 3

19

18%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

87

41%

LEVEL 2

64

30%

LEVEL 3

42

20%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

65
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

88

39%

LEVEL 2

72

32%

LEVEL 3

51

23%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

25

69%

LEVEL 2

9

25%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

35

76%

LEVEL 2

6

13%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

63
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

100

43%

LEVEL 2

70

30%

LEVEL 3

41

18%

LEVEL 4

22

9%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

69
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

110

43%

LEVEL 2

76

30%

LEVEL 3

53

21%

LEVEL 4

16

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

12

71%

LEVEL 2

3

18%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

13

81%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

21

33%

LEVEL 2

19

30%

LEVEL 3

13

21%

LEVEL 4

10

16%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

22

34%

LEVEL 2

13

20%

LEVEL 3

22

34%

LEVEL 4

8

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

91

49%

LEVEL 2

54

29%

LEVEL 3

30

16%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

101

49%

LEVEL 2

65

32%

LEVEL 3

32

16%

LEVEL 4

8

4%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

64
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

105

44%

LEVEL 2

70

29%

LEVEL 3

43

18%

LEVEL 4

21

9%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

68
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

112

43%

LEVEL 2

78

30%

LEVEL 3

53

21%

LEVEL 4

15

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

7

64%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

9%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

11

85%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.