MATTITUCK-CUTCHOGUE UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

29

11%

LEVEL 2

78

29%

LEVEL 3

102

38%

LEVEL 4

62

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

33

12%

LEVEL 2

86

31%

LEVEL 3

95

34%

LEVEL 4

67

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

70
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

13

10%

LEVEL 2

43

34%

LEVEL 3

42

33%

LEVEL 4

28

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

77
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 138

LEVEL 1

14

10%

LEVEL 2

47

34%

LEVEL 3

50

36%

LEVEL 4

27

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

94
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

16

11%

LEVEL 2

35

24%

LEVEL 3

60

41%

LEVEL 4

34

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

85
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

19

13%

LEVEL 2

39

27%

LEVEL 3

45

31%

LEVEL 4

40

28%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

142
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 222

LEVEL 1

17

8%

LEVEL 2

63

28%

LEVEL 3

84

38%

LEVEL 4

58

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

142
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

19

9%

LEVEL 2

60

27%

LEVEL 3

83

38%

LEVEL 4

59

27%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

11

25%

LEVEL 2

15

34%

LEVEL 3

16

36%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

12

23%

LEVEL 2

26

49%

LEVEL 3

10

19%

LEVEL 4

5

9%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

18

7%

LEVEL 2

67

28%

LEVEL 3

97

40%

LEVEL 4

61

25%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

77

30%

LEVEL 3

90

36%

LEVEL 4

66

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

11

39%

LEVEL 2

11

39%

LEVEL 3

5

18%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

13

46%

LEVEL 2

9

32%

LEVEL 3

5

18%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

161
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

22

9%

LEVEL 2

69

27%

LEVEL 3

99

39%

LEVEL 4

62

25%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

158
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

27

10%

LEVEL 2

77

29%

LEVEL 3

91

35%

LEVEL 4

67

26%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

7

37%

LEVEL 2

9

47%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

6

32%

LEVEL 2

9

47%

LEVEL 3

4

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

120
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

14

7%

LEVEL 2

56

29%

LEVEL 3

72

38%

LEVEL 4

48

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

118
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

17

9%

LEVEL 2

50

27%

LEVEL 3

71

38%

LEVEL 4

47

25%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

15

19%

LEVEL 2

22

27%

LEVEL 3

30

37%

LEVEL 4

14

17%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

44
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 96

LEVEL 1

16

17%

LEVEL 2

36

38%

LEVEL 3

24

25%

LEVEL 4

20

21%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

164
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

26

10%

LEVEL 2

76

29%

LEVEL 3

102

38%

LEVEL 4

62

23%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.