KINGS PARK CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

292
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 500

LEVEL 1

57

11%

LEVEL 2

151

30%

LEVEL 3

200

40%

LEVEL 4

92

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

291
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 497

LEVEL 1

47

9%

LEVEL 2

159

32%

LEVEL 3

170

34%

LEVEL 4

121

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

144
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

25

10%

LEVEL 2

77

31%

LEVEL 3

103

42%

LEVEL 4

41

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

131
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

21

9%

LEVEL 2

75

33%

LEVEL 3

80

35%

LEVEL 4

51

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

148
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

32

13%

LEVEL 2

74

29%

LEVEL 3

97

38%

LEVEL 4

51

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

160
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 270

LEVEL 1

26

10%

LEVEL 2

84

31%

LEVEL 3

90

33%

LEVEL 4

70

26%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

6

30%

LEVEL 3

5

25%

LEVEL 4

7

35%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

2

10%

LEVEL 2

1

5%

LEVEL 3

9

43%

LEVEL 4

9

43%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

249
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

48

11%

LEVEL 2

122

29%

LEVEL 3

171

41%

LEVEL 4

78

19%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

232
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

34

9%

LEVEL 2

132

33%

LEVEL 3

135

34%

LEVEL 4

97

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

5

10%

LEVEL 2

20

40%

LEVEL 3

19

38%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

32
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

10

15%

LEVEL 2

24

36%

LEVEL 3

21

32%

LEVEL 4

11

17%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

279
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 437

LEVEL 1

27

6%

LEVEL 2

131

30%

LEVEL 3

191

44%

LEVEL 4

88

20%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

275
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

21

5%

LEVEL 2

134

31%

LEVEL 3

158

37%

LEVEL 4

117

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

30

48%

LEVEL 2

20

32%

LEVEL 3

9

14%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

26

39%

LEVEL 2

25

37%

LEVEL 3

12

18%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

292
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 494

LEVEL 1

54

11%

LEVEL 2

148

30%

LEVEL 3

200

40%

LEVEL 4

92

19%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

289
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 487

LEVEL 1

42

9%

LEVEL 2

156

32%

LEVEL 3

169

35%

LEVEL 4

120

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

269
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

44

10%

LEVEL 2

125

29%

LEVEL 3

184

42%

LEVEL 4

85

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

261
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

36

8%

LEVEL 2

137

32%

LEVEL 3

148

34%

LEVEL 4

113

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

13

21%

LEVEL 2

26

42%

LEVEL 3

16

26%

LEVEL 4

7

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

11

17%

LEVEL 2

22

35%

LEVEL 3

22

35%

LEVEL 4

8

13%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.