Skip to Content
Main content

PHILLIPS AVENUE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

33
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 208

LEVEL 1

123

59%

LEVEL 2

52

25%

LEVEL 3

27

13%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

28
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

105

53%

LEVEL 2

64

32%

LEVEL 3

22

11%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

19
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

63

61%

LEVEL 2

22

21%

LEVEL 3

15

14%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

17
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 98

LEVEL 1

58

59%

LEVEL 2

23

23%

LEVEL 3

14

14%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

14
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

60

58%

LEVEL 2

30

29%

LEVEL 3

12

12%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

MALE

PROFICIENT

11
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 99

LEVEL 1

47

47%

LEVEL 2

41

41%

LEVEL 3

8

8%

LEVEL 4

3

3%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

10

59%

LEVEL 2

2

12%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

2

12%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

7
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

7

44%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

3

19%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

13

59%

LEVEL 2

4

18%

LEVEL 3

4

18%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

9

60%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

20
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

97

61%

LEVEL 2

43

27%

LEVEL 3

17

11%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

85

54%

LEVEL 2

55

35%

LEVEL 3

16

10%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

33
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

114

58%

LEVEL 2

51

26%

LEVEL 3

27

14%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

27
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 186

LEVEL 1

97

52%

LEVEL 2

62

33%

LEVEL 3

21

11%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

9

90%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

8

73%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

26
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

44

48%

LEVEL 2

22

24%

LEVEL 3

20

22%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

21
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

31

37%

LEVEL 2

32

38%

LEVEL 3

16

19%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

79

68%

LEVEL 2

30

26%

LEVEL 3

7

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

74

65%

LEVEL 2

32

28%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

8
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

26

65%

LEVEL 2

6

15%

LEVEL 3

7

18%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

27

69%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

25
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

97

58%

LEVEL 2

46

27%

LEVEL 3

20

12%

LEVEL 4

5

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 158

LEVEL 1

78

49%

LEVEL 2

54

34%

LEVEL 3

22

14%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

31
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

115

59%

LEVEL 2

49

25%

LEVEL 3

25

13%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

26
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

99

54%

LEVEL 2

59

32%

LEVEL 3

20

11%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

8

62%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.