Skip to Content
Main content

RIVERHEAD MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

52
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 361

LEVEL 1

231

64%

LEVEL 2

78

22%

LEVEL 3

40

11%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

70
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 417

LEVEL 1

233

56%

LEVEL 2

114

27%

LEVEL 3

46

11%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

18
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 141

LEVEL 1

94

67%

LEVEL 2

29

21%

LEVEL 3

13

9%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

21
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

92

53%

LEVEL 2

61

35%

LEVEL 3

10

6%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

137

62%

LEVEL 2

49

22%

LEVEL 3

27

12%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

141

58%

LEVEL 2

53

22%

LEVEL 3

36

15%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

22
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

40

49%

LEVEL 2

19

23%

LEVEL 3

17

21%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

37
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

33

30%

LEVEL 2

39

36%

LEVEL 3

21

19%

LEVEL 4

16

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

24

63%

LEVEL 2

10

26%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

28

67%

LEVEL 2

9

21%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 237

LEVEL 1

164

69%

LEVEL 2

48

20%

LEVEL 3

19

8%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

25
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 255

LEVEL 1

167

65%

LEVEL 2

63

25%

LEVEL 3

19

7%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

51
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

177

59%

LEVEL 2

73

24%

LEVEL 3

39

13%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

69
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

169

49%

LEVEL 2

107

31%

LEVEL 3

46

13%

LEVEL 4

23

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

54

90%

LEVEL 2

5

8%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

64

89%

LEVEL 2

7

10%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

51
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

126

51%

LEVEL 2

69

28%

LEVEL 3

39

16%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

68
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

140

45%

LEVEL 2

102

33%

LEVEL 3

44

14%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
1%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

105

91%

LEVEL 2

9

8%

LEVEL 3

1

1%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

93

87%

LEVEL 2

12

11%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

33

41%

LEVEL 2

22

27%

LEVEL 3

20

25%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

33

30%

LEVEL 2

37

34%

LEVEL 3

25

23%

LEVEL 4

15

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

198

71%

LEVEL 2

56

20%

LEVEL 3

20

7%

LEVEL 4

6

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

200

65%

LEVEL 2

77

25%

LEVEL 3

21

7%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

52
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

225

64%

LEVEL 2

77

22%

LEVEL 3

40

11%

LEVEL 4

12

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

69
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

229

56%

LEVEL 2

113

27%

LEVEL 3

45

11%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

6

86%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

51
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

207

62%

LEVEL 2

74

22%

LEVEL 3

40

12%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

68
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

215

54%

LEVEL 2

112

28%

LEVEL 3

45

11%

LEVEL 4

23

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

24

83%

LEVEL 2

4

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

18

82%

LEVEL 2

2

9%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.