Skip to Content
Main content

RILEY AVENUE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

77
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 164

LEVEL 1

50

30%

LEVEL 2

37

23%

LEVEL 3

52

32%

LEVEL 4

25

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

54
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

60

35%

LEVEL 2

56

33%

LEVEL 3

40

24%

LEVEL 4

14

8%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 70

LEVEL 1

14

20%

LEVEL 2

15

21%

LEVEL 3

29

41%

LEVEL 4

12

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

22
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 65

LEVEL 1

19

29%

LEVEL 2

24

37%

LEVEL 3

15

23%

LEVEL 4

7

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

36
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

36

38%

LEVEL 2

22

23%

LEVEL 3

23

24%

LEVEL 4

13

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

32
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

41

39%

LEVEL 2

32

30%

LEVEL 3

25

24%

LEVEL 4

7

7%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

54
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

10

13%

LEVEL 2

12

16%

LEVEL 3

36

47%

LEVEL 4

18

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

38
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

13

18%

LEVEL 2

23

31%

LEVEL 3

26

35%

LEVEL 4

12

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

9

60%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

10

67%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

30

44%

LEVEL 2

20

29%

LEVEL 3

13

19%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

34

47%

LEVEL 2

27

37%

LEVEL 3

10

14%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

25

19%

LEVEL 2

35

26%

LEVEL 3

51

38%

LEVEL 4

24

18%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

54
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

23

18%

LEVEL 2

49

39%

LEVEL 3

40

32%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

25

86%

LEVEL 2

2

7%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

37

84%

LEVEL 2

7

16%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

69
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

27

23%

LEVEL 2

23

19%

LEVEL 3

45

38%

LEVEL 4

24

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

51
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

30

26%

LEVEL 2

36

31%

LEVEL 3

37

32%

LEVEL 4

14

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

8
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

23

51%

LEVEL 2

14

31%

LEVEL 3

7

16%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

30

57%

LEVEL 2

20

38%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

7

11%

LEVEL 2

13

21%

LEVEL 3

25

40%

LEVEL 4

17

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

10

15%

LEVEL 2

21

31%

LEVEL 3

29

43%

LEVEL 4

8

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

35
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

43

42%

LEVEL 2

24

24%

LEVEL 3

27

26%

LEVEL 4

8

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

50

49%

LEVEL 2

35

34%

LEVEL 3

11

11%

LEVEL 4

6

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

74
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 159

LEVEL 1

50

31%

LEVEL 2

35

22%

LEVEL 3

49

31%

LEVEL 4

25

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

3

60%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

76
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

44

29%

LEVEL 2

33

22%

LEVEL 3

51

33%

LEVEL 4

25

16%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

52
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

56

35%

LEVEL 2

54

33%

LEVEL 3

39

24%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.