ANDREW T MORROW SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 382

LEVEL 1

138

36%

LEVEL 2

124

32%

LEVEL 3

90

24%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

96
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

80

32%

LEVEL 2

75

30%

LEVEL 3

66

26%

LEVEL 4

30

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

43
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

74

42%

LEVEL 2

60

34%

LEVEL 3

33

19%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

47
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

38

31%

LEVEL 2

39

31%

LEVEL 3

36

29%

LEVEL 4

11

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

64

31%

LEVEL 2

64

31%

LEVEL 3

57

28%

LEVEL 4

20

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

42

33%

LEVEL 2

36

28%

LEVEL 3

30

24%

LEVEL 4

19

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

6

40%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

5
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

3

33%

LEVEL 2

1

11%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

20

37%

LEVEL 2

18

33%

LEVEL 3

13

24%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

14

38%

LEVEL 2

12

32%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

89
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 299

LEVEL 1

111

37%

LEVEL 2

99

33%

LEVEL 3

71

24%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

79
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

60

30%

LEVEL 2

61

31%

LEVEL 3

55

28%

LEVEL 4

24

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 350

LEVEL 1

118

34%

LEVEL 2

116

33%

LEVEL 3

87

25%

LEVEL 4

29

8%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

70

31%

LEVEL 2

68

30%

LEVEL 3

61

27%

LEVEL 4

29

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

20

63%

LEVEL 2

8

25%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

10

43%

LEVEL 2

7

30%

LEVEL 3

5

22%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

106
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

60

23%

LEVEL 2

92

36%

LEVEL 3

77

30%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

87
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

40

21%

LEVEL 2

64

34%

LEVEL 3

59

31%

LEVEL 4

28

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

14
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 124

LEVEL 1

78

63%

LEVEL 2

32

26%

LEVEL 3

13

10%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

9
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

40

67%

LEVEL 2

11

18%

LEVEL 3

7

12%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

37
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

29

35%

LEVEL 2

18

21%

LEVEL 3

26

31%

LEVEL 4

11

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 100

LEVEL 1

28

28%

LEVEL 2

30

30%

LEVEL 3

27

27%

LEVEL 4

15

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 298

LEVEL 1

109

37%

LEVEL 2

106

36%

LEVEL 3

64

21%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 151

LEVEL 1

52

34%

LEVEL 2

45

30%

LEVEL 3

39

26%

LEVEL 4

15

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

120
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

135

36%

LEVEL 2

121

32%

LEVEL 3

90

24%

LEVEL 4

30

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

94
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

77

31%

LEVEL 2

74

30%

LEVEL 3

65

27%

LEVEL 4

29

12%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.