RALPH REED SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

83
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 617

LEVEL 1

415

67%

LEVEL 2

119

19%

LEVEL 3

59

10%

LEVEL 4

24

4%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

122
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 920

LEVEL 1

534

58%

LEVEL 2

264

29%

LEVEL 3

92

10%

LEVEL 4

30

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

41
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

194

66%

LEVEL 2

59

20%

LEVEL 3

29

10%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

56
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

238

55%

LEVEL 2

141

32%

LEVEL 3

45

10%

LEVEL 4

11

3%

MALE

PROFICIENT

42
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

221

68%

LEVEL 2

60

19%

LEVEL 3

30

9%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

66
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 485

LEVEL 1

296

61%

LEVEL 2

123

25%

LEVEL 3

47

10%

LEVEL 4

19

4%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

14
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 48

LEVEL 1

22

46%

LEVEL 2

12

25%

LEVEL 3

6

13%

LEVEL 4

8

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

21
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

47

52%

LEVEL 2

22

24%

LEVEL 3

14

16%

LEVEL 4

7

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

15
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

58

64%

LEVEL 2

17

19%

LEVEL 3

10

11%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

22
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

76

52%

LEVEL 2

48

33%

LEVEL 3

18

12%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

48
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 467

LEVEL 1

330

71%

LEVEL 2

89

19%

LEVEL 3

39

8%

LEVEL 4

9

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

71
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 666

LEVEL 1

406

61%

LEVEL 2

189

28%

LEVEL 3

54

8%

LEVEL 4

17

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

79
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 554

LEVEL 1

359

65%

LEVEL 2

116

21%

LEVEL 3

55

10%

LEVEL 4

24

4%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 832

LEVEL 1

453

54%

LEVEL 2

259

31%

LEVEL 3

90

11%

LEVEL 4

30

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

56

89%

LEVEL 2

3

5%

LEVEL 3

4

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 88

LEVEL 1

81

92%

LEVEL 2

5

6%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

82
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

217

54%

LEVEL 2

105

26%

LEVEL 3

58

14%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

121
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 652

LEVEL 1

295

45%

LEVEL 2

236

36%

LEVEL 3

91

14%

LEVEL 4

30

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 213

LEVEL 1

198

93%

LEVEL 2

14

7%

LEVEL 3

1

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 268

LEVEL 1

239

89%

LEVEL 2

28

10%

LEVEL 3

1

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

72

62%

LEVEL 2

24

21%

LEVEL 3

12

10%

LEVEL 4

8

7%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

218

55%

LEVEL 2

126

32%

LEVEL 3

36

9%

LEVEL 4

17

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

63
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 501

LEVEL 1

343

68%

LEVEL 2

95

19%

LEVEL 3

47

9%

LEVEL 4

16

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

69
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 523

LEVEL 1

316

60%

LEVEL 2

138

26%

LEVEL 3

56

11%

LEVEL 4

13

2%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

80
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 599

LEVEL 1

403

67%

LEVEL 2

116

19%

LEVEL 3

57

10%

LEVEL 4

23

4%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

121
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 900

LEVEL 1

520

58%

LEVEL 2

259

29%

LEVEL 3

91

10%

LEVEL 4

30

3%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

12

67%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

14

70%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

1

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.