LORETTA PARK ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

61
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

138

48%

LEVEL 2

89

31%

LEVEL 3

48

17%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

88
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 336

LEVEL 1

133

40%

LEVEL 2

115

34%

LEVEL 3

68

20%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

26
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 133

LEVEL 1

72

54%

LEVEL 2

35

26%

LEVEL 3

21

16%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

36
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 170

LEVEL 1

70

41%

LEVEL 2

64

38%

LEVEL 3

29

17%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

MALE

PROFICIENT

35
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

66

43%

LEVEL 2

54

35%

LEVEL 3

27

17%

LEVEL 4

8

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

63

38%

LEVEL 2

51

31%

LEVEL 3

39

23%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

8

38%

LEVEL 2

9

43%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

11

41%

LEVEL 2

6

22%

LEVEL 3

8

30%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

56
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 262

LEVEL 1

129

49%

LEVEL 2

77

29%

LEVEL 3

45

17%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

75
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 302

LEVEL 1

120

40%

LEVEL 2

107

35%

LEVEL 3

58

19%

LEVEL 4

17

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

57
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

110

44%

LEVEL 2

84

33%

LEVEL 3

45

18%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

85
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

118

38%

LEVEL 2

106

34%

LEVEL 3

66

21%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

28

76%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

15

56%

LEVEL 2

9

33%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

55
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 156

LEVEL 1

38

24%

LEVEL 2

63

40%

LEVEL 3

42

27%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

77
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

43

21%

LEVEL 2

82

41%

LEVEL 3

59

29%

LEVEL 4

18

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

100

76%

LEVEL 2

26

20%

LEVEL 3

6

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

11
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

90

67%

LEVEL 2

33

25%

LEVEL 3

9

7%

LEVEL 4

2

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

2

20%

LEVEL 2

5

50%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

3

23%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

3

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

136

49%

LEVEL 2

84

30%

LEVEL 3

45

16%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

81
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 323

LEVEL 1

130

40%

LEVEL 2

112

35%

LEVEL 3

64

20%

LEVEL 4

17

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

58
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

137

49%

LEVEL 2

86

31%

LEVEL 3

46

16%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

86
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

131

40%

LEVEL 2

113

34%

LEVEL 3

66

20%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

2

29%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.