BAY SHORE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

157

39%

LEVEL 2

113

28%

LEVEL 3

88

22%

LEVEL 4

48

12%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 421

LEVEL 1

141

33%

LEVEL 2

141

33%

LEVEL 3

91

22%

LEVEL 4

48

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

64
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 185

LEVEL 1

71

38%

LEVEL 2

50

27%

LEVEL 3

39

21%

LEVEL 4

25

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 204

LEVEL 1

74

36%

LEVEL 2

72

35%

LEVEL 3

36

18%

LEVEL 4

22

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

72
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

86

39%

LEVEL 2

63

29%

LEVEL 3

49

22%

LEVEL 4

23

10%

MALE

PROFICIENT

81
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

67

31%

LEVEL 2

69

32%

LEVEL 3

55

25%

LEVEL 4

26

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

16
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

5

18%

LEVEL 2

7

25%

LEVEL 3

8

29%

LEVEL 4

8

29%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

3

10%

LEVEL 2

12

40%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

10

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

48
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

13

15%

LEVEL 2

25

29%

LEVEL 3

23

27%

LEVEL 4

25

29%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

38
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 82

LEVEL 1

14

17%

LEVEL 2

30

37%

LEVEL 3

23

28%

LEVEL 4

15

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

17
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

53

58%

LEVEL 2

22

24%

LEVEL 3

11

12%

LEVEL 4

6

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

31
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

37

38%

LEVEL 2

29

30%

LEVEL 3

22

23%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

52
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

84

43%

LEVEL 2

59

30%

LEVEL 3

43

22%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

52
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

82

41%

LEVEL 2

65

33%

LEVEL 3

39

20%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

135
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 362

LEVEL 1

122

34%

LEVEL 2

105

29%

LEVEL 3

87

24%

LEVEL 4

48

13%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

136
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 372

LEVEL 1

109

29%

LEVEL 2

127

34%

LEVEL 3

88

24%

LEVEL 4

48

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

35

80%

LEVEL 2

8

18%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

32

65%

LEVEL 2

14

29%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

135
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

128

35%

LEVEL 2

107

29%

LEVEL 3

87

24%

LEVEL 4

48

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

138
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 376

LEVEL 1

104

28%

LEVEL 2

134

36%

LEVEL 3

90

24%

LEVEL 4

48

13%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

29

81%

LEVEL 2

6

17%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

37

82%

LEVEL 2

7

16%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

80
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

33

22%

LEVEL 2

39

26%

LEVEL 3

46

30%

LEVEL 4

34

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

28

20%

LEVEL 2

43

30%

LEVEL 3

45

31%

LEVEL 4

27

19%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

124

49%

LEVEL 2

74

29%

LEVEL 3

42

17%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

113

41%

LEVEL 2

98

35%

LEVEL 3

46

17%

LEVEL 4

21

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

136
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 400

LEVEL 1

153

38%

LEVEL 2

111

28%

LEVEL 3

88

22%

LEVEL 4

48

12%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

138
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 413

LEVEL 1

136

33%

LEVEL 2

139

34%

LEVEL 3

91

22%

LEVEL 4

47

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.