Skip to Content
Main content

HENRY L STIMSON MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

87
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 282

LEVEL 1

112

40%

LEVEL 2

83

29%

LEVEL 3

58

21%

LEVEL 4

29

10%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

102
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

166

45%

LEVEL 2

97

27%

LEVEL 3

80

22%

LEVEL 4

22

6%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

46

42%

LEVEL 2

28

26%

LEVEL 3

21

19%

LEVEL 4

14

13%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

48
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 155

LEVEL 1

60

39%

LEVEL 2

47

30%

LEVEL 3

38

25%

LEVEL 4

10

6%

MALE

PROFICIENT

52
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

66

38%

LEVEL 2

55

32%

LEVEL 3

37

21%

LEVEL 4

15

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

54
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

106

50%

LEVEL 2

50

24%

LEVEL 3

42

20%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

8

32%

LEVEL 2

7

28%

LEVEL 3

9

36%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

15
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

8

27%

LEVEL 2

7

23%

LEVEL 3

11

37%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

45
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

13

15%

LEVEL 2

28

33%

LEVEL 3

24

28%

LEVEL 4

21

24%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

50
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

25

25%

LEVEL 2

26

26%

LEVEL 3

38

38%

LEVEL 4

12

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

19

56%

LEVEL 2

11

32%

LEVEL 3

3

9%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

24

67%

LEVEL 2

9

25%

LEVEL 3

3

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

23
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 127

LEVEL 1

68

54%

LEVEL 2

36

28%

LEVEL 3

18

14%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

28
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 184

LEVEL 1

105

57%

LEVEL 2

51

28%

LEVEL 3

25

14%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

79

34%

LEVEL 2

74

31%

LEVEL 3

54

23%

LEVEL 4

28

12%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

125

39%

LEVEL 2

94

30%

LEVEL 3

78

25%

LEVEL 4

21

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

33

70%

LEVEL 2

9

19%

LEVEL 3

4

9%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

41

87%

LEVEL 2

3

6%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

87
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 226

LEVEL 1

63

28%

LEVEL 2

76

34%

LEVEL 3

58

26%

LEVEL 4

29

13%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

102
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

95

33%

LEVEL 2

93

32%

LEVEL 3

80

28%

LEVEL 4

22

8%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

49

88%

LEVEL 2

7

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

71

95%

LEVEL 2

4

5%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

19

16%

LEVEL 2

39

34%

LEVEL 3

36

31%

LEVEL 4

22

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

28

21%

LEVEL 2

42

32%

LEVEL 3

43

33%

LEVEL 4

19

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

93

56%

LEVEL 2

44

27%

LEVEL 3

22

13%

LEVEL 4

7

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

40
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 233

LEVEL 1

138

59%

LEVEL 2

55

24%

LEVEL 3

37

16%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.