GARDINER MANOR SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 410

LEVEL 1

168

41%

LEVEL 2

122

30%

LEVEL 3

96

23%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

139
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 446

LEVEL 1

162

36%

LEVEL 2

145

33%

LEVEL 3

90

20%

LEVEL 4

49

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

86

42%

LEVEL 2

64

31%

LEVEL 3

46

22%

LEVEL 4

9

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

63
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

85

38%

LEVEL 2

77

34%

LEVEL 3

45

20%

LEVEL 4

18

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

65
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

82

40%

LEVEL 2

58

28%

LEVEL 3

50

24%

LEVEL 4

15

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

76
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

77

35%

LEVEL 2

68

31%

LEVEL 3

45

20%

LEVEL 4

31

14%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

6

30%

LEVEL 2

8

40%

LEVEL 3

3

15%

LEVEL 4

3

15%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

7

27%

LEVEL 2

8

31%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

6

23%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

25
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 63

LEVEL 1

20

32%

LEVEL 2

18

29%

LEVEL 3

20

32%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

30
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

20

30%

LEVEL 2

16

24%

LEVEL 3

17

26%

LEVEL 4

13

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

23
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

39

45%

LEVEL 2

25

29%

LEVEL 3

18

21%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

18
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 75

LEVEL 1

35

47%

LEVEL 2

22

29%

LEVEL 3

15

20%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

61
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

96

43%

LEVEL 2

64

29%

LEVEL 3

51

23%

LEVEL 4

10

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

73
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 257

LEVEL 1

93

36%

LEVEL 2

91

35%

LEVEL 3

48

19%

LEVEL 4

25

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

120
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

125

35%

LEVEL 2

108

31%

LEVEL 3

96

27%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

129

32%

LEVEL 2

133

33%

LEVEL 3

88

22%

LEVEL 4

49

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

43

75%

LEVEL 2

14

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

33

70%

LEVEL 2

12

26%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

117
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

120

35%

LEVEL 2

105

31%

LEVEL 3

93

27%

LEVEL 4

24

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

135
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 386

LEVEL 1

124

32%

LEVEL 2

127

33%

LEVEL 3

87

23%

LEVEL 4

48

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

48

71%

LEVEL 2

17

25%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

38

63%

LEVEL 2

18

30%

LEVEL 3

3

5%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 130

LEVEL 1

30

23%

LEVEL 2

40

31%

LEVEL 3

47

36%

LEVEL 4

13

10%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

72
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 152

LEVEL 1

37

24%

LEVEL 2

43

28%

LEVEL 3

45

30%

LEVEL 4

27

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

138

49%

LEVEL 2

82

29%

LEVEL 3

49

18%

LEVEL 4

11

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 294

LEVEL 1

125

43%

LEVEL 2

102

35%

LEVEL 3

45

15%

LEVEL 4

22

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

118
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 399

LEVEL 1

159

40%

LEVEL 2

122

31%

LEVEL 3

94

24%

LEVEL 4

24

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

137
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

158

36%

LEVEL 2

141

32%

LEVEL 3

88

20%

LEVEL 4

49

11%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

9

82%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.