Skip to Content
Main content

MAPLEWOOD INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

158
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 380

LEVEL 1

134

35%

LEVEL 2

88

23%

LEVEL 3

100

26%

LEVEL 4

58

15%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

168
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 351

LEVEL 1

102

29%

LEVEL 2

81

23%

LEVEL 3

102

29%

LEVEL 4

66

19%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

85
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 198

LEVEL 1

71

36%

LEVEL 2

42

21%

LEVEL 3

56

28%

LEVEL 4

29

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

82
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

53

29%

LEVEL 2

47

26%

LEVEL 3

51

28%

LEVEL 4

31

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

73
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

63

35%

LEVEL 2

46

25%

LEVEL 3

44

24%

LEVEL 4

29

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

49

29%

LEVEL 2

34

20%

LEVEL 3

51

30%

LEVEL 4

35

21%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

4

27%

LEVEL 4

7

47%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

14
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

3

14%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

6

27%

LEVEL 4

8

36%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

18
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

1

4%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

10

43%

LEVEL 4

8

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

69
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

19

17%

LEVEL 2

21

19%

LEVEL 3

41

38%

LEVEL 4

28

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

71
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

17

16%

LEVEL 2

18

17%

LEVEL 3

39

37%

LEVEL 4

32

30%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

10
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

19

54%

LEVEL 2

6

17%

LEVEL 3

7

20%

LEVEL 4

3

9%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

15

33%

LEVEL 2

14

31%

LEVEL 3

11

24%

LEVEL 4

5

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

54
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 197

LEVEL 1

90

46%

LEVEL 2

53

27%

LEVEL 3

39

20%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

51
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

68

43%

LEVEL 2

38

24%

LEVEL 3

38

24%

LEVEL 4

13

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

152
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

95

29%

LEVEL 2

82

25%

LEVEL 3

96

29%

LEVEL 4

56

17%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 306

LEVEL 1

73

24%

LEVEL 2

74

24%

LEVEL 3

93

30%

LEVEL 4

66

22%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

39

76%

LEVEL 2

6

12%

LEVEL 3

4

8%

LEVEL 4

2

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

29

64%

LEVEL 2

7

16%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

152
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

74

25%

LEVEL 2

67

23%

LEVEL 3

94

32%

LEVEL 4

58

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

163
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

47

17%

LEVEL 2

70

25%

LEVEL 3

97

35%

LEVEL 4

66

24%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

60

69%

LEVEL 2

21

24%

LEVEL 3

6

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

5
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

55

77%

LEVEL 2

11

15%

LEVEL 3

5

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

102
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

17

11%

LEVEL 2

30

20%

LEVEL 3

61

41%

LEVEL 4

41

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

101
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 135

LEVEL 1

10

7%

LEVEL 2

24

18%

LEVEL 3

61

45%

LEVEL 4

40

30%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

117

51%

LEVEL 2

58

25%

LEVEL 3

39

17%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

67
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

92

43%

LEVEL 2

57

26%

LEVEL 3

41

19%

LEVEL 4

26

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

157
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 370

LEVEL 1

126

34%

LEVEL 2

87

24%

LEVEL 3

99

27%

LEVEL 4

58

16%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

166
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 342

LEVEL 1

100

29%

LEVEL 2

76

22%

LEVEL 3

100

29%

LEVEL 4

66

19%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

8

80%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

1

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

2

22%

LEVEL 2

5

56%

LEVEL 3

2

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.