Skip to Content
Main content

COMMACK UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

463
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 811

LEVEL 1

118

15%

LEVEL 2

230

28%

LEVEL 3

302

37%

LEVEL 4

161

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

478
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 805

LEVEL 1

127

16%

LEVEL 2

200

25%

LEVEL 3

284

35%

LEVEL 4

194

24%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

197
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

59

16%

LEVEL 2

119

32%

LEVEL 3

135

36%

LEVEL 4

62

17%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

204
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 360

LEVEL 1

54

15%

LEVEL 2

102

28%

LEVEL 3

125

35%

LEVEL 4

79

22%

MALE

PROFICIENT

266
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

59

14%

LEVEL 2

111

25%

LEVEL 3

167

38%

LEVEL 4

99

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

274
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

73

16%

LEVEL 2

98

22%

LEVEL 3

159

36%

LEVEL 4

115

26%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

10

45%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

7

32%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

16
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

5

22%

LEVEL 3

8

35%

LEVEL 4

8

35%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

103
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 140

LEVEL 1

5

4%

LEVEL 2

32

23%

LEVEL 3

53

38%

LEVEL 4

50

36%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

130
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

14

8%

LEVEL 2

33

19%

LEVEL 3

62

35%

LEVEL 4

68

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

311
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 549

LEVEL 1

79

14%

LEVEL 2

159

29%

LEVEL 3

218

40%

LEVEL 4

93

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

293
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 510

LEVEL 1

76

15%

LEVEL 2

141

28%

LEVEL 3

186

36%

LEVEL 4

107

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

9

43%

LEVEL 2

7

33%

LEVEL 3

3

14%

LEVEL 4

2

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

30
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

23

30%

LEVEL 2

24

31%

LEVEL 3

21

27%

LEVEL 4

9

12%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

34
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

26

35%

LEVEL 2

14

19%

LEVEL 3

25

34%

LEVEL 4

9

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

451
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 718

LEVEL 1

65

9%

LEVEL 2

202

28%

LEVEL 3

291

41%

LEVEL 4

160

22%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

465
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 729

LEVEL 1

85

12%

LEVEL 2

179

25%

LEVEL 3

275

38%

LEVEL 4

190

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

12
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 93

LEVEL 1

53

57%

LEVEL 2

28

30%

LEVEL 3

11

12%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 76

LEVEL 1

42

55%

LEVEL 2

21

28%

LEVEL 3

9

12%

LEVEL 4

4

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

461
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 799

LEVEL 1

117

15%

LEVEL 2

221

28%

LEVEL 3

300

38%

LEVEL 4

161

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

471
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 783

LEVEL 1

118

15%

LEVEL 2

194

25%

LEVEL 3

279

36%

LEVEL 4

192

25%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

9

75%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

7
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

9

41%

LEVEL 2

6

27%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

410
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 694

LEVEL 1

89

13%

LEVEL 2

195

28%

LEVEL 3

265

38%

LEVEL 4

145

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

420
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 679

LEVEL 1

95

14%

LEVEL 2

164

24%

LEVEL 3

240

35%

LEVEL 4

180

27%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

53
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

29

25%

LEVEL 2

35

30%

LEVEL 3

37

32%

LEVEL 4

16

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

58
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 126

LEVEL 1

32

25%

LEVEL 2

36

29%

LEVEL 3

44

35%

LEVEL 4

14

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.