THOMAS J LAHEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

302
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 457

LEVEL 1

55

12%

LEVEL 2

100

22%

LEVEL 3

180

39%

LEVEL 4

122

27%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

320
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 462

LEVEL 1

42

9%

LEVEL 2

100

22%

LEVEL 3

171

37%

LEVEL 4

149

32%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

129
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

25

12%

LEVEL 2

52

25%

LEVEL 3

86

42%

LEVEL 4

43

21%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

144
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

16

8%

LEVEL 2

49

23%

LEVEL 3

83

40%

LEVEL 4

61

29%

MALE

PROFICIENT

173
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 251

LEVEL 1

30

12%

LEVEL 2

48

19%

LEVEL 3

94

37%

LEVEL 4

79

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

176
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

26

10%

LEVEL 2

51

20%

LEVEL 3

88

35%

LEVEL 4

88

35%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

16
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

4

15%

LEVEL 2

7

26%

LEVEL 3

7

26%

LEVEL 4

9

33%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

23
79%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

2

7%

LEVEL 2

4

14%

LEVEL 3

17

59%

LEVEL 4

6

21%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

24
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

4

13%

LEVEL 2

4

13%

LEVEL 3

16

50%

LEVEL 4

8

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

231
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 308

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

63

20%

LEVEL 3

133

43%

LEVEL 4

98

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

231
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

59

19%

LEVEL 3

115

38%

LEVEL 4

116

38%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

7

30%

LEVEL 2

8

35%

LEVEL 3

6

26%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

24
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

27

37%

LEVEL 2

22

30%

LEVEL 3

18

25%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

40
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

15

19%

LEVEL 2

25

31%

LEVEL 3

28

35%

LEVEL 4

12

15%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

286
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

30

7%

LEVEL 2

88

22%

LEVEL 3

170

42%

LEVEL 4

116

29%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

299
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 405

LEVEL 1

20

5%

LEVEL 2

86

21%

LEVEL 3

158

39%

LEVEL 4

141

35%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

16
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 53

LEVEL 1

25

47%

LEVEL 2

12

23%

LEVEL 3

10

19%

LEVEL 4

6

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

21
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

22

39%

LEVEL 2

14

25%

LEVEL 3

13

23%

LEVEL 4

8

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

299
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 438

LEVEL 1

42

10%

LEVEL 2

97

22%

LEVEL 3

177

40%

LEVEL 4

122

28%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

314
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

32

7%

LEVEL 2

89

20%

LEVEL 3

165

38%

LEVEL 4

149

34%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

13

68%

LEVEL 2

3

16%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

6
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

10

37%

LEVEL 2

11

41%

LEVEL 3

6

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

282
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 384

LEVEL 1

22

6%

LEVEL 2

80

21%

LEVEL 3

165

43%

LEVEL 4

117

30%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

284
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 379

LEVEL 1

25

7%

LEVEL 2

70

18%

LEVEL 3

145

38%

LEVEL 4

139

37%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

33

45%

LEVEL 2

20

27%

LEVEL 3

15

21%

LEVEL 4

5

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

17

20%

LEVEL 2

30

36%

LEVEL 3

26

31%

LEVEL 4

10

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.