Skip to Content
Main content

WOODHULL INTERMEDIATE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

94
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

136

44%

LEVEL 2

77

25%

LEVEL 3

52

17%

LEVEL 4

42

14%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 389

LEVEL 1

154

40%

LEVEL 2

101

26%

LEVEL 3

83

21%

LEVEL 4

51

13%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

44
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

54

41%

LEVEL 2

33

25%

LEVEL 3

26

20%

LEVEL 4

18

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 202

LEVEL 1

71

35%

LEVEL 2

53

26%

LEVEL 3

48

24%

LEVEL 4

30

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

50
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 176

LEVEL 1

82

47%

LEVEL 2

44

25%

LEVEL 3

26

15%

LEVEL 4

24

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 187

LEVEL 1

83

44%

LEVEL 2

48

26%

LEVEL 3

35

19%

LEVEL 4

21

11%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

49
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 84

LEVEL 1

15

18%

LEVEL 2

20

24%

LEVEL 3

22

26%

LEVEL 4

27

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

68
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

6

7%

LEVEL 2

16

18%

LEVEL 3

36

40%

LEVEL 4

32

36%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 21

LEVEL 1

15

71%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

2

10%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

8

57%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

2

14%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

37
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

102

54%

LEVEL 2

49

26%

LEVEL 3

25

13%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

56
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

136

51%

LEVEL 2

75

28%

LEVEL 3

42

16%

LEVEL 4

14

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

95

38%

LEVEL 2

68

27%

LEVEL 3

49

19%

LEVEL 4

41

16%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

131
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 353

LEVEL 1

127

36%

LEVEL 2

95

27%

LEVEL 3

81

23%

LEVEL 4

50

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 54

LEVEL 1

41

76%

LEVEL 2

9

17%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

27

75%

LEVEL 2

6

17%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

92
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

87

36%

LEVEL 2

62

26%

LEVEL 3

50

21%

LEVEL 4

42

17%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

128
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

68

26%

LEVEL 2

70

26%

LEVEL 3

78

29%

LEVEL 4

50

19%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 66

LEVEL 1

49

74%

LEVEL 2

15

23%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

6
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 123

LEVEL 1

86

70%

LEVEL 2

31

25%

LEVEL 3

5

4%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 101

LEVEL 1

16

16%

LEVEL 2

25

25%

LEVEL 3

25

25%

LEVEL 4

35

35%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

84
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

8

7%

LEVEL 2

23

20%

LEVEL 3

46

40%

LEVEL 4

38

33%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

120

58%

LEVEL 2

52

25%

LEVEL 3

27

13%

LEVEL 4

7

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

50
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

146

53%

LEVEL 2

78

28%

LEVEL 3

37

14%

LEVEL 4

13

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

133
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 383

LEVEL 1

150

39%

LEVEL 2

100

26%

LEVEL 3

83

22%

LEVEL 4

50

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

4

67%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.