WILLIAM PACA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

75
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

108

44%

LEVEL 2

60

25%

LEVEL 3

52

21%

LEVEL 4

23

9%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

84
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

100

40%

LEVEL 2

69

27%

LEVEL 3

55

22%

LEVEL 4

29

11%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

35
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 109

LEVEL 1

49

45%

LEVEL 2

25

23%

LEVEL 3

28

26%

LEVEL 4

7

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

38
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

41

39%

LEVEL 2

27

25%

LEVEL 3

26

25%

LEVEL 4

12

11%

MALE

PROFICIENT

40
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 134

LEVEL 1

59

44%

LEVEL 2

35

26%

LEVEL 3

24

18%

LEVEL 4

16

12%

MALE

PROFICIENT

46
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

59

40%

LEVEL 2

42

29%

LEVEL 3

29

20%

LEVEL 4

17

12%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

7

64%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

3
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

8

47%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

3

18%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

33
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

33

36%

LEVEL 2

25

27%

LEVEL 3

23

25%

LEVEL 4

10

11%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

41
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

25

29%

LEVEL 2

21

24%

LEVEL 3

23

26%

LEVEL 4

18

21%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

30

61%

LEVEL 2

11

22%

LEVEL 3

5

10%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

40

67%

LEVEL 2

14

23%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

33

41%

LEVEL 2

18

23%

LEVEL 3

22

28%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

31
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

26

32%

LEVEL 2

24

30%

LEVEL 3

21

26%

LEVEL 4

10

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

71
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 205

LEVEL 1

79

39%

LEVEL 2

55

27%

LEVEL 3

48

23%

LEVEL 4

23

11%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

82
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 206

LEVEL 1

64

31%

LEVEL 2

60

29%

LEVEL 3

53

26%

LEVEL 4

29

14%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

29

76%

LEVEL 2

5

13%

LEVEL 3

4

11%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

36

77%

LEVEL 2

9

19%

LEVEL 3

2

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

73
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

97

42%

LEVEL 2

60

26%

LEVEL 3

50

22%

LEVEL 4

23

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

84
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

95

39%

LEVEL 2

66

27%

LEVEL 3

55

22%

LEVEL 4

29

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

11

85%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

5

63%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

17

22%

LEVEL 2

24

31%

LEVEL 3

22

29%

LEVEL 4

14

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 74

LEVEL 1

14

19%

LEVEL 2

24

32%

LEVEL 3

20

27%

LEVEL 4

16

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

39
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 166

LEVEL 1

91

55%

LEVEL 2

36

22%

LEVEL 3

30

18%

LEVEL 4

9

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 179

LEVEL 1

86

48%

LEVEL 2

45

25%

LEVEL 3

35

20%

LEVEL 4

13

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

72
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

101

44%

LEVEL 2

55

24%

LEVEL 3

50

22%

LEVEL 4

22

10%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

79
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

88

38%

LEVEL 2

64

28%

LEVEL 3

50

22%

LEVEL 4

29

13%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

7

47%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

5
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

12

55%

LEVEL 2

5

23%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.