MILLER PLACE UFSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

148
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

78

26%

LEVEL 2

78

26%

LEVEL 3

99

33%

LEVEL 4

49

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

165
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 329

LEVEL 1

71

22%

LEVEL 2

93

28%

LEVEL 3

106

32%

LEVEL 4

59

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

67
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 131

LEVEL 1

30

23%

LEVEL 2

34

26%

LEVEL 3

47

36%

LEVEL 4

20

15%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

77
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

24

16%

LEVEL 2

48

32%

LEVEL 3

54

36%

LEVEL 4

23

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

81
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

48

28%

LEVEL 2

44

25%

LEVEL 3

52

30%

LEVEL 4

29

17%

MALE

PROFICIENT

88
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

47

26%

LEVEL 2

45

25%

LEVEL 3

52

29%

LEVEL 4

36

20%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

3

23%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

3

19%

LEVEL 3

3

19%

LEVEL 4

8

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

1

7%

LEVEL 2

3

20%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

8

53%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

119
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 246

LEVEL 1

62

25%

LEVEL 2

65

26%

LEVEL 3

81

33%

LEVEL 4

38

15%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

137
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 266

LEVEL 1

54

20%

LEVEL 2

75

28%

LEVEL 3

94

35%

LEVEL 4

43

16%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

11
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

9

32%

LEVEL 2

8

29%

LEVEL 3

9

32%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

10
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

10

33%

LEVEL 2

10

33%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

3

10%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

146
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

48

18%

LEVEL 2

70

27%

LEVEL 3

97

37%

LEVEL 4

49

19%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

41

14%

LEVEL 2

84

29%

LEVEL 3

104

36%

LEVEL 4

59

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

30

75%

LEVEL 2

8

20%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

30

73%

LEVEL 2

9

22%

LEVEL 3

2

5%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

161
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

68

21%

LEVEL 2

89

28%

LEVEL 3

104

33%

LEVEL 4

57

18%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

3

27%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

138
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

54

21%

LEVEL 2

66

26%

LEVEL 3

90

35%

LEVEL 4

48

19%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

148
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

48

18%

LEVEL 2

73

27%

LEVEL 3

94

35%

LEVEL 4

54

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

24

52%

LEVEL 2

12

26%

LEVEL 3

9

20%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

17
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 60

LEVEL 1

23

38%

LEVEL 2

20

33%

LEVEL 3

12

20%

LEVEL 4

5

8%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.