Skip to Content
Main content

SENECA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

101
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

36

18%

LEVEL 2

59

30%

LEVEL 3

55

28%

LEVEL 4

46

23%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

124
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

24

12%

LEVEL 2

48

24%

LEVEL 3

70

36%

LEVEL 4

54

28%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

9

11%

LEVEL 2

22

27%

LEVEL 3

29

35%

LEVEL 4

23

28%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

8

9%

LEVEL 2

16

17%

LEVEL 3

39

42%

LEVEL 4

29

32%

MALE

PROFICIENT

49
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

27

24%

LEVEL 2

37

33%

LEVEL 3

26

23%

LEVEL 4

23

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

56
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

16

15%

LEVEL 2

32

31%

LEVEL 3

31

30%

LEVEL 4

25

24%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

3

30%

LEVEL 4

5

50%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

18%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

7

64%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

5

19%

LEVEL 2

4

15%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

12

46%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

17
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

2

9%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

8

36%

LEVEL 4

9

41%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

64
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 117

LEVEL 1

20

17%

LEVEL 2

33

28%

LEVEL 3

40

34%

LEVEL 4

24

21%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

77
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

13

11%

LEVEL 2

26

22%

LEVEL 3

47

41%

LEVEL 4

30

26%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

3

43%

LEVEL 2

4

57%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

12
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

8

22%

LEVEL 2

16

44%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

5

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

6

16%

LEVEL 2

13

35%

LEVEL 3

11

30%

LEVEL 4

7

19%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

97
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

16

9%

LEVEL 2

56

33%

LEVEL 3

52

31%

LEVEL 4

45

27%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

123
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 181

LEVEL 1

14

8%

LEVEL 2

44

24%

LEVEL 3

69

38%

LEVEL 4

54

30%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

20

74%

LEVEL 2

3

11%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

10

67%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

1

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

23

16%

LEVEL 2

39

27%

LEVEL 3

43

30%

LEVEL 4

40

28%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

101
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

16

10%

LEVEL 2

36

24%

LEVEL 3

56

37%

LEVEL 4

45

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

13

25%

LEVEL 2

20

39%

LEVEL 3

12

24%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

23
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 43

LEVEL 1

8

19%

LEVEL 2

12

28%

LEVEL 3

14

33%

LEVEL 4

9

21%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.