Skip to Content
Main content

MARTIN LUTHER KING ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

117
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

184

44%

LEVEL 2

121

29%

LEVEL 3

84

20%

LEVEL 4

33

8%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 608

LEVEL 1

289

48%

LEVEL 2

165

27%

LEVEL 3

96

16%

LEVEL 4

58

10%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

55
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

94

45%

LEVEL 2

62

29%

LEVEL 3

41

19%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

68
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

143

48%

LEVEL 2

90

30%

LEVEL 3

44

15%

LEVEL 4

24

8%

MALE

PROFICIENT

62
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 211

LEVEL 1

90

43%

LEVEL 2

59

28%

LEVEL 3

43

20%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

146

48%

LEVEL 2

75

24%

LEVEL 3

52

17%

LEVEL 4

34

11%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

3

60%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

47
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 183

LEVEL 1

90

49%

LEVEL 2

46

25%

LEVEL 3

32

17%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

55
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

133

53%

LEVEL 2

65

26%

LEVEL 3

37

15%

LEVEL 4

18

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

67
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

90

39%

LEVEL 2

71

31%

LEVEL 3

50

22%

LEVEL 4

17

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

98
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

150

43%

LEVEL 2

97

28%

LEVEL 3

59

17%

LEVEL 4

39

11%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

109
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

143

40%

LEVEL 2

106

30%

LEVEL 3

76

21%

LEVEL 4

33

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

141
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 525

LEVEL 1

232

44%

LEVEL 2

152

29%

LEVEL 3

85

16%

LEVEL 4

56

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

41

64%

LEVEL 2

15

23%

LEVEL 3

8

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

57

69%

LEVEL 2

13

16%

LEVEL 3

11

13%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

89
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

113

41%

LEVEL 2

71

26%

LEVEL 3

63

23%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

111
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

168

42%

LEVEL 2

119

30%

LEVEL 3

65

16%

LEVEL 4

46

12%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

28
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 149

LEVEL 1

71

48%

LEVEL 2

50

34%

LEVEL 3

21

14%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

43
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 210

LEVEL 1

121

58%

LEVEL 2

46

22%

LEVEL 3

31

15%

LEVEL 4

12

6%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

10
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

15

50%

LEVEL 2

5

17%

LEVEL 3

6

20%

LEVEL 4

4

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

18
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

31

54%

LEVEL 2

8

14%

LEVEL 3

13

23%

LEVEL 4

5

9%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

107
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 392

LEVEL 1

169

43%

LEVEL 2

116

30%

LEVEL 3

78

20%

LEVEL 4

29

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

136
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 551

LEVEL 1

258

47%

LEVEL 2

157

28%

LEVEL 3

83

15%

LEVEL 4

53

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

111
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 397

LEVEL 1

169

43%

LEVEL 2

117

29%

LEVEL 3

79

20%

LEVEL 4

32

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

144
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 553

LEVEL 1

259

47%

LEVEL 2

150

27%

LEVEL 3

90

16%

LEVEL 4

54

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

6
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 25

LEVEL 1

15

60%

LEVEL 2

4

16%

LEVEL 3

5

20%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

10
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 55

LEVEL 1

30

55%

LEVEL 2

15

27%

LEVEL 3

6

11%

LEVEL 4

4

7%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.