MILTON L OLIVE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

37
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 675

LEVEL 1

530

79%

LEVEL 2

108

16%

LEVEL 3

31

5%

LEVEL 4

6

1%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

55
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 450

LEVEL 1

285

63%

LEVEL 2

110

24%

LEVEL 3

40

9%

LEVEL 4

15

3%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

24
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 332

LEVEL 1

247

74%

LEVEL 2

61

18%

LEVEL 3

21

6%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

33
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

128

58%

LEVEL 2

59

27%

LEVEL 3

21

10%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

MALE

PROFICIENT

13
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 343

LEVEL 1

283

83%

LEVEL 2

47

14%

LEVEL 3

10

3%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

MALE

PROFICIENT

22
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 230

LEVEL 1

157

68%

LEVEL 2

51

22%

LEVEL 3

19

8%

LEVEL 4

3

1%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

6

75%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

8
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

236

81%

LEVEL 2

49

17%

LEVEL 3

7

2%

LEVEL 4

1

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

13
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

136

71%

LEVEL 2

42

22%

LEVEL 3

10

5%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

29
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 368

LEVEL 1

284

77%

LEVEL 2

55

15%

LEVEL 3

24

7%

LEVEL 4

5

1%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

40
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 252

LEVEL 1

147

58%

LEVEL 2

65

26%

LEVEL 3

28

11%

LEVEL 4

12

5%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

37
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 560

LEVEL 1

422

75%

LEVEL 2

101

18%

LEVEL 3

31

6%

LEVEL 4

6

1%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

52
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 367

LEVEL 1

221

60%

LEVEL 2

94

26%

LEVEL 3

37

10%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

108

94%

LEVEL 2

7

6%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 83

LEVEL 1

64

77%

LEVEL 2

16

19%

LEVEL 3

3

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

33
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 515

LEVEL 1

378

73%

LEVEL 2

104

20%

LEVEL 3

27

5%

LEVEL 4

6

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

53
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 358

LEVEL 1

209

58%

LEVEL 2

96

27%

LEVEL 3

38

11%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

4
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 160

LEVEL 1

152

95%

LEVEL 2

4

3%

LEVEL 3

4

3%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
2%
TOTAL TESTED: 92

LEVEL 1

76

83%

LEVEL 2

14

15%

LEVEL 3

2

2%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 45

LEVEL 1

29

64%

LEVEL 2

13

29%

LEVEL 3

3

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

9
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 46

LEVEL 1

25

54%

LEVEL 2

12

26%

LEVEL 3

8

17%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

34
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 630

LEVEL 1

501

80%

LEVEL 2

95

15%

LEVEL 3

28

4%

LEVEL 4

6

1%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 404

LEVEL 1

260

64%

LEVEL 2

98

24%

LEVEL 3

32

8%

LEVEL 4

14

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

37
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 635

LEVEL 1

497

78%

LEVEL 2

101

16%

LEVEL 3

31

5%

LEVEL 4

6

1%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

53
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 423

LEVEL 1

270

64%

LEVEL 2

100

24%

LEVEL 3

38

9%

LEVEL 4

15

4%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

33

83%

LEVEL 2

7

18%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

15

56%

LEVEL 2

10

37%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.