Skip to Content
Main content

PARK AVENUE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 325

LEVEL 1

162

50%

LEVEL 2

100

31%

LEVEL 3

44

14%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

90
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

167

47%

LEVEL 2

95

27%

LEVEL 3

65

18%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

29
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

74

50%

LEVEL 2

44

30%

LEVEL 3

22

15%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

39
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 162

LEVEL 1

78

48%

LEVEL 2

45

28%

LEVEL 3

28

17%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

34
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

88

49%

LEVEL 2

56

31%

LEVEL 3

22

12%

LEVEL 4

12

7%

MALE

PROFICIENT

51
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

89

47%

LEVEL 2

50

26%

LEVEL 3

37

19%

LEVEL 4

14

7%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

2

40%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

2

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

3
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

4

44%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

3

33%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

1

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

16
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 132

LEVEL 1

71

54%

LEVEL 2

45

34%

LEVEL 3

11

8%

LEVEL 4

5

4%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

30
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

60

47%

LEVEL 2

38

30%

LEVEL 3

24

19%

LEVEL 4

6

5%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

41
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

85

49%

LEVEL 2

48

28%

LEVEL 3

30

17%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

51
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 200

LEVEL 1

98

49%

LEVEL 2

51

26%

LEVEL 3

36

18%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

63
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 301

LEVEL 1

142

47%

LEVEL 2

96

32%

LEVEL 3

44

15%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

89
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 324

LEVEL 1

144

44%

LEVEL 2

91

28%

LEVEL 3

64

20%

LEVEL 4

25

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

20

83%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

1
4%
TOTAL TESTED: 28

LEVEL 1

23

82%

LEVEL 2

4

14%

LEVEL 3

1

4%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

63
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

114

42%

LEVEL 2

96

35%

LEVEL 3

44

16%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

90
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

100

36%

LEVEL 2

84

31%

LEVEL 3

65

24%

LEVEL 4

25

9%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

48

92%

LEVEL 2

4

8%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

67

86%

LEVEL 2

11

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

15
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

17

33%

LEVEL 2

20

38%

LEVEL 3

8

15%

LEVEL 4

7

13%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 72

LEVEL 1

24

33%

LEVEL 2

18

25%

LEVEL 3

24

33%

LEVEL 4

6

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

48
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

145

53%

LEVEL 2

80

29%

LEVEL 3

36

13%

LEVEL 4

12

4%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 280

LEVEL 1

143

51%

LEVEL 2

77

28%

LEVEL 3

41

15%

LEVEL 4

19

7%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

62
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 320

LEVEL 1

158

49%

LEVEL 2

100

31%

LEVEL 3

43

13%

LEVEL 4

19

6%

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

4

80%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

61
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 307

LEVEL 1

149

49%

LEVEL 2

97

32%

LEVEL 3

43

14%

LEVEL 4

18

6%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

87
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

162

48%

LEVEL 2

89

26%

LEVEL 3

62

18%

LEVEL 4

25

7%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
11%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

13

72%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

6

43%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.