CAMPBELL-SAVONA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

106
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 231

LEVEL 1

50

22%

LEVEL 2

75

32%

LEVEL 3

67

29%

LEVEL 4

39

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

106
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

55

24%

LEVEL 2

64

28%

LEVEL 3

67

30%

LEVEL 4

39

17%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

19

17%

LEVEL 2

38

33%

LEVEL 3

37

32%

LEVEL 4

21

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

58
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 110

LEVEL 1

25

23%

LEVEL 2

27

25%

LEVEL 3

36

33%

LEVEL 4

22

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 116

LEVEL 1

31

27%

LEVEL 2

37

32%

LEVEL 3

30

26%

LEVEL 4

18

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

48
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 115

LEVEL 1

30

26%

LEVEL 2

37

32%

LEVEL 3

31

27%

LEVEL 4

17

15%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

103
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 221

LEVEL 1

49

22%

LEVEL 2

69

31%

LEVEL 3

65

29%

LEVEL 4

38

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

103
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

55

25%

LEVEL 2

58

27%

LEVEL 3

64

30%

LEVEL 4

39

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

2

40%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

99
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

39

19%

LEVEL 2

71

34%

LEVEL 3

62

30%

LEVEL 4

37

18%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

100
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 199

LEVEL 1

40

20%

LEVEL 2

59

30%

LEVEL 3

61

31%

LEVEL 4

39

20%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

11

50%

LEVEL 2

4

18%

LEVEL 3

5

23%

LEVEL 4

2

9%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

15

58%

LEVEL 2

5

19%

LEVEL 3

6

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 94

LEVEL 1

16

17%

LEVEL 2

32

34%

LEVEL 3

26

28%

LEVEL 4

20

21%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

55
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

16

15%

LEVEL 2

34

32%

LEVEL 3

33

31%

LEVEL 4

22

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

60
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 137

LEVEL 1

34

25%

LEVEL 2

43

31%

LEVEL 3

41

30%

LEVEL 4

19

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 120

LEVEL 1

39

33%

LEVEL 2

30

25%

LEVEL 3

34

28%

LEVEL 4

17

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

105
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 225

LEVEL 1

48

21%

LEVEL 2

72

32%

LEVEL 3

66

29%

LEVEL 4

39

17%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.