Skip to Content
Main content

BATH CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

149

36%

LEVEL 2

123

29%

LEVEL 3

116

28%

LEVEL 4

31

7%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

181
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 527

LEVEL 1

182

35%

LEVEL 2

164

31%

LEVEL 3

131

25%

LEVEL 4

50

9%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

78
34%
TOTAL TESTED: 228

LEVEL 1

80

35%

LEVEL 2

70

31%

LEVEL 3

64

28%

LEVEL 4

14

6%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

86
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

93

34%

LEVEL 2

94

34%

LEVEL 3

62

23%

LEVEL 4

24

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

69
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 191

LEVEL 1

69

36%

LEVEL 2

53

28%

LEVEL 3

52

27%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

95
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

89

35%

LEVEL 2

70

28%

LEVEL 3

69

27%

LEVEL 4

26

10%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

147
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 406

LEVEL 1

143

35%

LEVEL 2

116

29%

LEVEL 3

116

29%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

178
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 508

LEVEL 1

173

34%

LEVEL 2

157

31%

LEVEL 3

128

25%

LEVEL 4

50

10%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

4

57%

LEVEL 2

3

43%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

1
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

6

55%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

138
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 352

LEVEL 1

98

28%

LEVEL 2

116

33%

LEVEL 3

108

31%

LEVEL 4

30

9%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

174
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 449

LEVEL 1

126

28%

LEVEL 2

149

33%

LEVEL 3

126

28%

LEVEL 4

48

11%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

51

76%

LEVEL 2

7

10%

LEVEL 3

8

12%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 78

LEVEL 1

56

72%

LEVEL 2

15

19%

LEVEL 3

5

6%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

34

22%

LEVEL 2

47

31%

LEVEL 3

51

33%

LEVEL 4

22

14%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

98
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 214

LEVEL 1

50

23%

LEVEL 2

66

31%

LEVEL 3

68

32%

LEVEL 4

30

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

115

43%

LEVEL 2

76

29%

LEVEL 3

65

25%

LEVEL 4

9

3%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

83
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

132

42%

LEVEL 2

98

31%

LEVEL 3

63

20%

LEVEL 4

20

6%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

146
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 411

LEVEL 1

145

35%

LEVEL 2

120

29%

LEVEL 3

115

28%

LEVEL 4

31

8%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

179
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 510

LEVEL 1

173

34%

LEVEL 2

158

31%

LEVEL 3

129

25%

LEVEL 4

50

10%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

4

50%

LEVEL 2

3

38%

LEVEL 3

1

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
12%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

9

53%

LEVEL 2

6

35%

LEVEL 3

2

12%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.