Skip to Content
Main content

ELIZABETH CADY STANTON ELEM SCH GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

129
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 264

LEVEL 1

66

25%

LEVEL 2

69

26%

LEVEL 3

76

29%

LEVEL 4

53

20%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

116
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 273

LEVEL 1

73

27%

LEVEL 2

84

31%

LEVEL 3

75

27%

LEVEL 4

41

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

52
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 121

LEVEL 1

35

29%

LEVEL 2

34

28%

LEVEL 3

29

24%

LEVEL 4

23

19%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

49
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 128

LEVEL 1

38

30%

LEVEL 2

41

32%

LEVEL 3

29

23%

LEVEL 4

20

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

77
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 143

LEVEL 1

31

22%

LEVEL 2

35

24%

LEVEL 3

47

33%

LEVEL 4

30

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

67
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 145

LEVEL 1

35

24%

LEVEL 2

43

30%

LEVEL 3

46

32%

LEVEL 4

21

14%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

6

46%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

5

83%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

8
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

1

10%

LEVEL 2

1

10%

LEVEL 3

4

40%

LEVEL 4

4

40%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

109
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

52

24%

LEVEL 2

55

25%

LEVEL 3

65

30%

LEVEL 4

44

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

94
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 227

LEVEL 1

59

26%

LEVEL 2

74

33%

LEVEL 3

64

28%

LEVEL 4

30

13%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

3

50%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

6

33%

LEVEL 2

8

44%

LEVEL 3

2

11%

LEVEL 4

2

11%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

4

25%

LEVEL 2

7

44%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

127
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 235

LEVEL 1

40

17%

LEVEL 2

68

29%

LEVEL 3

74

31%

LEVEL 4

53

23%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

112
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

50

21%

LEVEL 2

81

33%

LEVEL 3

73

30%

LEVEL 4

39

16%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

26

90%

LEVEL 2

1

3%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

23

77%

LEVEL 2

3

10%

LEVEL 3

2

7%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

126
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 258

LEVEL 1

65

25%

LEVEL 2

67

26%

LEVEL 3

74

29%

LEVEL 4

52

20%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

115
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 267

LEVEL 1

70

26%

LEVEL 2

82

31%

LEVEL 3

75

28%

LEVEL 4

40

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

1

17%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

2

33%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

73
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 111

LEVEL 1

9

8%

LEVEL 2

29

26%

LEVEL 3

39

35%

LEVEL 4

34

31%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

74
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 119

LEVEL 1

12

10%

LEVEL 2

33

28%

LEVEL 3

47

39%

LEVEL 4

27

23%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 153

LEVEL 1

57

37%

LEVEL 2

40

26%

LEVEL 3

37

24%

LEVEL 4

19

12%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

61

40%

LEVEL 2

51

33%

LEVEL 3

28

18%

LEVEL 4

14

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

—
TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

—

—

LEVEL 2

—

—

LEVEL 3

—

—

LEVEL 4

—

—

Top

  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.