VAN CORLAER ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

25
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

128

66%

LEVEL 2

42

22%

LEVEL 3

21

11%

LEVEL 4

4

2%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

50
24%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

116

56%

LEVEL 2

43

21%

LEVEL 3

39

19%

LEVEL 4

11

5%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

18
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

66

63%

LEVEL 2

21

20%

LEVEL 3

14

13%

LEVEL 4

4

4%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

33
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

54

51%

LEVEL 2

18

17%

LEVEL 3

24

23%

LEVEL 4

9

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

7
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

62

69%

LEVEL 2

21

23%

LEVEL 3

7

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

MALE

PROFICIENT

17
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 104

LEVEL 1

62

60%

LEVEL 2

25

24%

LEVEL 3

15

14%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

1
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

14

74%

LEVEL 2

4

21%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

12

46%

LEVEL 2

9

35%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

6

38%

LEVEL 2

8

50%

LEVEL 3

2

13%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

6

50%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

15
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

40

56%

LEVEL 2

16

23%

LEVEL 3

12

17%

LEVEL 4

3

4%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

20
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

27

44%

LEVEL 2

15

24%

LEVEL 3

13

21%

LEVEL 4

7

11%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

31

74%

LEVEL 2

7

17%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 51

LEVEL 1

33

65%

LEVEL 2

9

18%

LEVEL 3

6

12%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 47

LEVEL 1

37

79%

LEVEL 2

7

15%

LEVEL 3

3

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 58

LEVEL 1

41

71%

LEVEL 2

8

14%

LEVEL 3

9

16%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

25
16%
TOTAL TESTED: 154

LEVEL 1

88

57%

LEVEL 2

41

27%

LEVEL 3

21

14%

LEVEL 4

4

3%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

50
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

76

46%

LEVEL 2

39

24%

LEVEL 3

39

24%

LEVEL 4

11

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 41

LEVEL 1

40

98%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

40

91%

LEVEL 2

4

9%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

3
9%
TOTAL TESTED: 34

LEVEL 1

18

53%

LEVEL 2

13

38%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

14
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

16

46%

LEVEL 2

5

14%

LEVEL 3

9

26%

LEVEL 4

5

14%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

22
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 161

LEVEL 1

110

68%

LEVEL 2

29

18%

LEVEL 3

19

12%

LEVEL 4

3

2%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

36
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

100

57%

LEVEL 2

38

22%

LEVEL 3

30

17%

LEVEL 4

6

3%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

49
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 196

LEVEL 1

106

54%

LEVEL 2

41

21%

LEVEL 3

38

19%

LEVEL 4

11

6%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

10

77%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.