SCHALMONT CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

280
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 604

LEVEL 1

139

23%

LEVEL 2

185

31%

LEVEL 3

168

28%

LEVEL 4

112

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

297
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 643

LEVEL 1

162

25%

LEVEL 2

184

29%

LEVEL 3

184

29%

LEVEL 4

113

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

132
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

51

19%

LEVEL 2

91

33%

LEVEL 3

84

31%

LEVEL 4

48

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

145
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

68

22%

LEVEL 2

91

30%

LEVEL 3

98

32%

LEVEL 4

47

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

148
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 330

LEVEL 1

88

27%

LEVEL 2

94

28%

LEVEL 3

84

25%

LEVEL 4

64

19%

MALE

PROFICIENT

152
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 339

LEVEL 1

94

28%

LEVEL 2

93

27%

LEVEL 3

86

25%

LEVEL 4

66

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

13
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

6

20%

LEVEL 2

11

37%

LEVEL 3

8

27%

LEVEL 4

5

17%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

11

41%

LEVEL 2

6

22%

LEVEL 3

6

22%

LEVEL 4

4

15%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

3

19%

LEVEL 2

4

25%

LEVEL 3

5

31%

LEVEL 4

4

25%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

3

23%

LEVEL 4

6

46%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

240
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 513

LEVEL 1

114

22%

LEVEL 2

159

31%

LEVEL 3

146

28%

LEVEL 4

94

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

257
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 553

LEVEL 1

130

24%

LEVEL 2

166

30%

LEVEL 3

162

29%

LEVEL 4

95

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

12

33%

LEVEL 2

9

25%

LEVEL 3

8

22%

LEVEL 4

7

19%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

16

42%

LEVEL 2

6

16%

LEVEL 3

10

26%

LEVEL 4

6

16%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

277
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 542

LEVEL 1

86

16%

LEVEL 2

179

33%

LEVEL 3

166

31%

LEVEL 4

111

20%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

293
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 579

LEVEL 1

112

19%

LEVEL 2

174

30%

LEVEL 3

182

31%

LEVEL 4

111

19%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

3
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 62

LEVEL 1

53

85%

LEVEL 2

6

10%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

50

78%

LEVEL 2

10

16%

LEVEL 3

2

3%

LEVEL 4

2

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

234
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 422

LEVEL 1

63

15%

LEVEL 2

125

30%

LEVEL 3

137

32%

LEVEL 4

97

23%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

241
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 436

LEVEL 1

73

17%

LEVEL 2

122

28%

LEVEL 3

147

34%

LEVEL 4

94

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

76

42%

LEVEL 2

60

33%

LEVEL 3

31

17%

LEVEL 4

15

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

56
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 207

LEVEL 1

89

43%

LEVEL 2

62

30%

LEVEL 3

37

18%

LEVEL 4

19

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.