ROTTERDAM-MOHONASEN CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

256
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 633

LEVEL 1

181

29%

LEVEL 2

196

31%

LEVEL 3

157

25%

LEVEL 4

99

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

302
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 774

LEVEL 1

240

31%

LEVEL 2

232

30%

LEVEL 3

185

24%

LEVEL 4

117

15%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

106
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 293

LEVEL 1

82

28%

LEVEL 2

105

36%

LEVEL 3

59

20%

LEVEL 4

47

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

137
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

115

31%

LEVEL 2

119

32%

LEVEL 3

85

23%

LEVEL 4

52

14%

MALE

PROFICIENT

150
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 340

LEVEL 1

99

29%

LEVEL 2

91

27%

LEVEL 3

98

29%

LEVEL 4

52

15%

MALE

PROFICIENT

165
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 403

LEVEL 1

125

31%

LEVEL 2

113

28%

LEVEL 3

100

25%

LEVEL 4

65

16%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
15%
TOTAL TESTED: 33

LEVEL 1

16

48%

LEVEL 2

12

36%

LEVEL 3

4

12%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 50

LEVEL 1

21

42%

LEVEL 2

19

38%

LEVEL 3

7

14%

LEVEL 4

3

6%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

12
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

4

15%

LEVEL 2

10

38%

LEVEL 3

6

23%

LEVEL 4

6

23%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

218
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 491

LEVEL 1

122

25%

LEVEL 2

151

31%

LEVEL 3

135

27%

LEVEL 4

83

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

256
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 585

LEVEL 1

166

28%

LEVEL 2

163

28%

LEVEL 3

155

26%

LEVEL 4

101

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

7
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

17

46%

LEVEL 2

13

35%

LEVEL 3

7

19%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

15
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 56

LEVEL 1

26

46%

LEVEL 2

15

27%

LEVEL 3

8

14%

LEVEL 4

7

13%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

18
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

33

45%

LEVEL 2

22

30%

LEVEL 3

9

12%

LEVEL 4

9

12%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

250
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 560

LEVEL 1

124

22%

LEVEL 2

186

33%

LEVEL 3

151

27%

LEVEL 4

99

18%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

296
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 672

LEVEL 1

162

24%

LEVEL 2

214

32%

LEVEL 3

179

27%

LEVEL 4

117

17%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
8%
TOTAL TESTED: 73

LEVEL 1

57

78%

LEVEL 2

10

14%

LEVEL 3

6

8%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
6%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

78

76%

LEVEL 2

18

18%

LEVEL 3

6

6%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

253
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 620

LEVEL 1

173

28%

LEVEL 2

194

31%

LEVEL 3

156

25%

LEVEL 4

97

16%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

299
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 768

LEVEL 1

238

31%

LEVEL 2

231

30%

LEVEL 3

182

24%

LEVEL 4

117

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

8

62%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

1

8%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

1

17%

LEVEL 3

3

50%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

197
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

83

21%

LEVEL 2

115

29%

LEVEL 3

118

30%

LEVEL 4

79

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

213
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 433

LEVEL 1

90

21%

LEVEL 2

130

30%

LEVEL 3

127

29%

LEVEL 4

86

20%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 238

LEVEL 1

98

41%

LEVEL 2

81

34%

LEVEL 3

39

16%

LEVEL 4

20

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

89
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 341

LEVEL 1

150

44%

LEVEL 2

102

30%

LEVEL 3

58

17%

LEVEL 4

31

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.