Skip to Content
Main content

SCHALMONT MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

164
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 394

LEVEL 1

91

23%

LEVEL 2

139

35%

LEVEL 3

100

25%

LEVEL 4

64

16%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

156
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 407

LEVEL 1

118

29%

LEVEL 2

133

33%

LEVEL 3

109

27%

LEVEL 4

47

12%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

80
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

31

17%

LEVEL 2

67

38%

LEVEL 3

55

31%

LEVEL 4

25

14%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

75
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

50

27%

LEVEL 2

63

34%

LEVEL 3

58

31%

LEVEL 4

17

9%

MALE

PROFICIENT

84
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 216

LEVEL 1

60

28%

LEVEL 2

72

33%

LEVEL 3

45

21%

LEVEL 4

39

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

81
37%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

68

31%

LEVEL 2

70

32%

LEVEL 3

51

23%

LEVEL 4

30

14%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

6
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

8

50%

LEVEL 3

4

25%

LEVEL 4

2

13%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

6

40%

LEVEL 2

5

33%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

3

30%

LEVEL 2

3

30%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

2

20%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

4
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

2

25%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

2

25%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

145
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 337

LEVEL 1

72

21%

LEVEL 2

120

36%

LEVEL 3

88

26%

LEVEL 4

57

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

140
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

94

27%

LEVEL 2

120

34%

LEVEL 3

99

28%

LEVEL 4

41

12%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

11

42%

LEVEL 2

8

31%

LEVEL 3

5

19%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

13

54%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

5

21%

LEVEL 4

2

8%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

162
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 355

LEVEL 1

58

16%

LEVEL 2

135

38%

LEVEL 3

99

28%

LEVEL 4

63

18%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

154
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 365

LEVEL 1

84

23%

LEVEL 2

127

35%

LEVEL 3

108

30%

LEVEL 4

46

13%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 39

LEVEL 1

33

85%

LEVEL 2

4

10%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
5%
TOTAL TESTED: 42

LEVEL 1

34

81%

LEVEL 2

6

14%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

145
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 288

LEVEL 1

45

16%

LEVEL 2

98

34%

LEVEL 3

86

30%

LEVEL 4

59

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

130
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

50

18%

LEVEL 2

91

34%

LEVEL 3

90

33%

LEVEL 4

40

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

19
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

46

43%

LEVEL 2

41

39%

LEVEL 3

14

13%

LEVEL 4

5

5%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

26
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 136

LEVEL 1

68

50%

LEVEL 2

42

31%

LEVEL 3

19

14%

LEVEL 4

7

5%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.