SCOTIA-GLENVILLE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

359
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 773

LEVEL 1

197

25%

LEVEL 2

217

28%

LEVEL 3

214

28%

LEVEL 4

145

19%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

431
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 805

LEVEL 1

184

23%

LEVEL 2

190

24%

LEVEL 3

246

31%

LEVEL 4

185

23%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

172
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 354

LEVEL 1

92

26%

LEVEL 2

90

25%

LEVEL 3

110

31%

LEVEL 4

62

18%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

193
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

93

25%

LEVEL 2

89

24%

LEVEL 3

125

33%

LEVEL 4

68

18%

MALE

PROFICIENT

187
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 419

LEVEL 1

105

25%

LEVEL 2

127

30%

LEVEL 3

104

25%

LEVEL 4

83

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

238
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 430

LEVEL 1

91

21%

LEVEL 2

101

23%

LEVEL 3

121

28%

LEVEL 4

117

27%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

342
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 695

LEVEL 1

156

22%

LEVEL 2

197

28%

LEVEL 3

202

29%

LEVEL 4

140

20%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

403
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 728

LEVEL 1

151

21%

LEVEL 2

174

24%

LEVEL 3

225

31%

LEVEL 4

178

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

16

53%

LEVEL 2

11

37%

LEVEL 3

1

3%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

11
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

8

35%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

10

43%

LEVEL 4

1

4%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
23%
TOTAL TESTED: 31

LEVEL 1

18

58%

LEVEL 2

6

19%

LEVEL 3

7

23%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

9
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 35

LEVEL 1

19

54%

LEVEL 2

7

20%

LEVEL 3

8

23%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

349
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 671

LEVEL 1

120

18%

LEVEL 2

202

30%

LEVEL 3

206

31%

LEVEL 4

143

21%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

421
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 708

LEVEL 1

116

16%

LEVEL 2

171

24%

LEVEL 3

238

34%

LEVEL 4

183

26%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

77

75%

LEVEL 2

15

15%

LEVEL 3

8

8%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

10
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

68

70%

LEVEL 2

19

20%

LEVEL 3

8

8%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

297
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 534

LEVEL 1

89

17%

LEVEL 2

148

28%

LEVEL 3

171

32%

LEVEL 4

126

24%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

339
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 561

LEVEL 1

95

17%

LEVEL 2

127

23%

LEVEL 3

182

32%

LEVEL 4

157

28%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

62
26%
TOTAL TESTED: 239

LEVEL 1

108

45%

LEVEL 2

69

29%

LEVEL 3

43

18%

LEVEL 4

19

8%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

92
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 244

LEVEL 1

89

36%

LEVEL 2

63

26%

LEVEL 3

64

26%

LEVEL 4

28

11%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.