DOROTHY NOLAN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

223
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 345

LEVEL 1

39

11%

LEVEL 2

83

24%

LEVEL 3

115

33%

LEVEL 4

108

31%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

246
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 346

LEVEL 1

38

11%

LEVEL 2

62

18%

LEVEL 3

119

34%

LEVEL 4

127

37%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

111
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 180

LEVEL 1

24

13%

LEVEL 2

45

25%

LEVEL 3

62

34%

LEVEL 4

49

27%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

123
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

17

10%

LEVEL 2

38

21%

LEVEL 3

64

36%

LEVEL 4

59

33%

MALE

PROFICIENT

112
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 165

LEVEL 1

15

9%

LEVEL 2

38

23%

LEVEL 3

53

32%

LEVEL 4

59

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

123
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

21

13%

LEVEL 2

24

14%

LEVEL 3

55

33%

LEVEL 4

68

40%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

9
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

1

8%

LEVEL 3

7

54%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

10
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

2

15%

LEVEL 3

6

46%

LEVEL 4

4

31%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

202
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 309

LEVEL 1

31

10%

LEVEL 2

76

25%

LEVEL 3

103

33%

LEVEL 4

99

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

223
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 316

LEVEL 1

35

11%

LEVEL 2

58

18%

LEVEL 3

105

33%

LEVEL 4

118

37%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

4

29%

LEVEL 3

4

29%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

4

57%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

218
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 318

LEVEL 1

25

8%

LEVEL 2

75

24%

LEVEL 3

112

35%

LEVEL 4

106

33%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

238
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 310

LEVEL 1

20

6%

LEVEL 2

52

17%

LEVEL 3

111

36%

LEVEL 4

127

41%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
19%
TOTAL TESTED: 27

LEVEL 1

14

52%

LEVEL 2

8

30%

LEVEL 3

3

11%

LEVEL 4

2

7%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

8
22%
TOTAL TESTED: 36

LEVEL 1

18

50%

LEVEL 2

10

28%

LEVEL 3

8

22%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

191
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 265

LEVEL 1

11

4%

LEVEL 2

63

24%

LEVEL 3

91

34%

LEVEL 4

100

38%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

217
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 269

LEVEL 1

14

5%

LEVEL 2

38

14%

LEVEL 3

97

36%

LEVEL 4

120

45%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

32
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 80

LEVEL 1

28

35%

LEVEL 2

20

25%

LEVEL 3

24

30%

LEVEL 4

8

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

29
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 77

LEVEL 1

24

31%

LEVEL 2

24

31%

LEVEL 3

22

29%

LEVEL 4

7

9%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

222
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 338

LEVEL 1

34

10%

LEVEL 2

82

24%

LEVEL 3

115

34%

LEVEL 4

107

32%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
14%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

5

71%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.