Skip to Content
Main content

OLIVER W WINCH MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

223
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 495

LEVEL 1

115

23%

LEVEL 2

157

32%

LEVEL 3

134

27%

LEVEL 4

89

18%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

245
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 498

LEVEL 1

123

25%

LEVEL 2

130

26%

LEVEL 3

153

31%

LEVEL 4

92

18%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

100
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 219

LEVEL 1

38

17%

LEVEL 2

81

37%

LEVEL 3

66

30%

LEVEL 4

34

16%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

120
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 224

LEVEL 1

44

20%

LEVEL 2

60

27%

LEVEL 3

69

31%

LEVEL 4

51

23%

MALE

PROFICIENT

123
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 276

LEVEL 1

77

28%

LEVEL 2

76

28%

LEVEL 3

68

25%

LEVEL 4

55

20%

MALE

PROFICIENT

125
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 274

LEVEL 1

79

29%

LEVEL 2

70

26%

LEVEL 3

84

31%

LEVEL 4

41

15%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

4
33%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

3

25%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

1

8%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

5
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

3

23%

LEVEL 2

5

38%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

3

23%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

6
75%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

6

75%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

207
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 457

LEVEL 1

104

23%

LEVEL 2

146

32%

LEVEL 3

125

27%

LEVEL 4

82

18%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

226
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 455

LEVEL 1

114

25%

LEVEL 2

115

25%

LEVEL 3

145

32%

LEVEL 4

81

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

1

14%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

5

36%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

3

21%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

8

53%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

1

7%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

221
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 434

LEVEL 1

71

16%

LEVEL 2

142

33%

LEVEL 3

133

31%

LEVEL 4

88

20%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

241
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 441

LEVEL 1

81

18%

LEVEL 2

119

27%

LEVEL 3

149

34%

LEVEL 4

92

21%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
3%
TOTAL TESTED: 61

LEVEL 1

44

72%

LEVEL 2

15

25%

LEVEL 3

1

2%

LEVEL 4

1

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 57

LEVEL 1

42

74%

LEVEL 2

11

19%

LEVEL 3

4

7%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

172
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 321

LEVEL 1

52

16%

LEVEL 2

97

30%

LEVEL 3

100

31%

LEVEL 4

72

22%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

191
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

55

17%

LEVEL 2

85

26%

LEVEL 3

119

36%

LEVEL 4

72

22%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

51
29%
TOTAL TESTED: 174

LEVEL 1

63

36%

LEVEL 2

60

34%

LEVEL 3

34

20%

LEVEL 4

17

10%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

54
32%
TOTAL TESTED: 167

LEVEL 1

68

41%

LEVEL 2

45

27%

LEVEL 3

34

20%

LEVEL 4

20

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

244
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 492

LEVEL 1

121

25%

LEVEL 2

127

26%

LEVEL 3

153

31%

LEVEL 4

91

18%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

2

33%

LEVEL 2

3

50%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

1

17%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.