SCHUYLERVILLE CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

291
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 571

LEVEL 1

91

16%

LEVEL 2

189

33%

LEVEL 3

164

29%

LEVEL 4

127

22%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

321
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 562

LEVEL 1

92

16%

LEVEL 2

149

27%

LEVEL 3

166

30%

LEVEL 4

155

28%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

146
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 281

LEVEL 1

40

14%

LEVEL 2

95

34%

LEVEL 3

79

28%

LEVEL 4

67

24%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

163
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

40

14%

LEVEL 2

81

29%

LEVEL 3

85

30%

LEVEL 4

78

27%

MALE

PROFICIENT

145
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 290

LEVEL 1

51

18%

LEVEL 2

94

32%

LEVEL 3

85

29%

LEVEL 4

60

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

158
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 278

LEVEL 1

52

19%

LEVEL 2

68

24%

LEVEL 3

81

29%

LEVEL 4

77

28%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

282
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 550

LEVEL 1

85

15%

LEVEL 2

183

33%

LEVEL 3

160

29%

LEVEL 4

122

22%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

313
58%
TOTAL TESTED: 543

LEVEL 1

86

16%

LEVEL 2

144

27%

LEVEL 3

159

29%

LEVEL 4

154

28%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

2
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

4

40%

LEVEL 2

4

40%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

287
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 531

LEVEL 1

70

13%

LEVEL 2

174

33%

LEVEL 3

160

30%

LEVEL 4

127

24%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

314
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 524

LEVEL 1

70

13%

LEVEL 2

140

27%

LEVEL 3

161

31%

LEVEL 4

153

29%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

21

53%

LEVEL 2

15

38%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

7
18%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

22

58%

LEVEL 2

9

24%

LEVEL 3

5

13%

LEVEL 4

2

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

234
55%
TOTAL TESTED: 424

LEVEL 1

53

13%

LEVEL 2

137

32%

LEVEL 3

123

29%

LEVEL 4

111

26%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

264
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 416

LEVEL 1

48

12%

LEVEL 2

104

25%

LEVEL 3

131

31%

LEVEL 4

133

32%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 147

LEVEL 1

38

26%

LEVEL 2

52

35%

LEVEL 3

41

28%

LEVEL 4

16

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

57
39%
TOTAL TESTED: 146

LEVEL 1

44

30%

LEVEL 2

45

31%

LEVEL 3

35

24%

LEVEL 4

22

15%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

289
51%
TOTAL TESTED: 566

LEVEL 1

89

16%

LEVEL 2

188

33%

LEVEL 3

163

29%

LEVEL 4

126

22%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

318
57%
TOTAL TESTED: 557

LEVEL 1

90

16%

LEVEL 2

149

27%

LEVEL 3

164

29%

LEVEL 4

154

28%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.