GOWANA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

332
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 494

LEVEL 1

44

9%

LEVEL 2

118

24%

LEVEL 3

158

32%

LEVEL 4

174

35%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

363
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 472

LEVEL 1

32

7%

LEVEL 2

77

16%

LEVEL 3

185

39%

LEVEL 4

178

38%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

166
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 253

LEVEL 1

24

9%

LEVEL 2

63

25%

LEVEL 3

84

33%

LEVEL 4

82

32%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

175
76%
TOTAL TESTED: 229

LEVEL 1

12

5%

LEVEL 2

42

18%

LEVEL 3

91

40%

LEVEL 4

84

37%

MALE

PROFICIENT

166
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 241

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

55

23%

LEVEL 3

74

31%

LEVEL 4

92

38%

MALE

PROFICIENT

188
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 243

LEVEL 1

20

8%

LEVEL 2

35

14%

LEVEL 3

94

39%

LEVEL 4

94

39%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

16
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 24

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

5

21%

LEVEL 3

7

29%

LEVEL 4

9

38%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

18
82%
TOTAL TESTED: 22

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

3

14%

LEVEL 3

7

32%

LEVEL 4

11

50%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

41
93%
TOTAL TESTED: 44

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

2

5%

LEVEL 3

11

25%

LEVEL 4

30

68%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

32
86%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

2

5%

LEVEL 2

3

8%

LEVEL 3

11

30%

LEVEL 4

21

57%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

257
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 395

LEVEL 1

36

9%

LEVEL 2

102

26%

LEVEL 3

130

33%

LEVEL 4

127

32%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

288
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 375

LEVEL 1

24

6%

LEVEL 2

63

17%

LEVEL 3

153

41%

LEVEL 4

135

36%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

3

25%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

3

25%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

9
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

2

13%

LEVEL 2

4

27%

LEVEL 3

3

20%

LEVEL 4

6

40%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

13
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

1

5%

LEVEL 2

5

26%

LEVEL 3

7

37%

LEVEL 4

6

32%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 23

LEVEL 1

3

13%

LEVEL 2

4

17%

LEVEL 3

11

48%

LEVEL 4

5

22%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

318
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 442

LEVEL 1

27

6%

LEVEL 2

97

22%

LEVEL 3

148

33%

LEVEL 4

170

38%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

350
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 435

LEVEL 1

18

4%

LEVEL 2

67

15%

LEVEL 3

173

40%

LEVEL 4

177

41%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

14
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 52

LEVEL 1

17

33%

LEVEL 2

21

40%

LEVEL 3

10

19%

LEVEL 4

4

8%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

13
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 37

LEVEL 1

14

38%

LEVEL 2

10

27%

LEVEL 3

12

32%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

302
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 426

LEVEL 1

30

7%

LEVEL 2

94

22%

LEVEL 3

140

33%

LEVEL 4

162

38%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

330
81%
TOTAL TESTED: 408

LEVEL 1

18

4%

LEVEL 2

60

15%

LEVEL 3

166

41%

LEVEL 4

164

40%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

30
44%
TOTAL TESTED: 68

LEVEL 1

14

21%

LEVEL 2

24

35%

LEVEL 3

18

26%

LEVEL 4

12

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

33
52%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

14

22%

LEVEL 2

17

27%

LEVEL 3

19

30%

LEVEL 4

14

22%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.