ACADIA MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

386
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 531

LEVEL 1

38

7%

LEVEL 2

107

20%

LEVEL 3

164

31%

LEVEL 4

222

42%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

350
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 485

LEVEL 1

47

10%

LEVEL 2

88

18%

LEVEL 3

165

34%

LEVEL 4

185

38%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

191
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 260

LEVEL 1

15

6%

LEVEL 2

54

21%

LEVEL 3

89

34%

LEVEL 4

102

39%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

176
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 245

LEVEL 1

24

10%

LEVEL 2

45

18%

LEVEL 3

87

36%

LEVEL 4

89

36%

MALE

PROFICIENT

195
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 271

LEVEL 1

23

8%

LEVEL 2

53

20%

LEVEL 3

75

28%

LEVEL 4

120

44%

MALE

PROFICIENT

174
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 240

LEVEL 1

23

10%

LEVEL 2

43

18%

LEVEL 3

78

33%

LEVEL 4

96

40%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

2

11%

LEVEL 2

5

28%

LEVEL 3

5

28%

LEVEL 4

6

33%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

11
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 18

LEVEL 1

4

22%

LEVEL 2

3

17%

LEVEL 3

7

39%

LEVEL 4

4

22%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

86
89%
TOTAL TESTED: 97

LEVEL 1

1

1%

LEVEL 2

10

10%

LEVEL 3

24

25%

LEVEL 4

62

64%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

70
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

6

7%

LEVEL 2

15

16%

LEVEL 3

19

21%

LEVEL 4

51

56%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

266
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 371

LEVEL 1

28

8%

LEVEL 2

77

21%

LEVEL 3

123

33%

LEVEL 4

143

39%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

241
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 326

LEVEL 1

29

9%

LEVEL 2

56

17%

LEVEL 3

125

38%

LEVEL 4

116

36%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

6
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

1

8%

LEVEL 2

6

46%

LEVEL 3

4

31%

LEVEL 4

2

15%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

12
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 20

LEVEL 1

3

15%

LEVEL 2

5

25%

LEVEL 3

6

30%

LEVEL 4

6

30%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

17
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

6

19%

LEVEL 2

9

28%

LEVEL 3

8

25%

LEVEL 4

9

28%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

16
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 30

LEVEL 1

5

17%

LEVEL 2

9

30%

LEVEL 3

8

27%

LEVEL 4

8

27%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

382
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 499

LEVEL 1

22

4%

LEVEL 2

95

19%

LEVEL 3

162

32%

LEVEL 4

220

44%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

345
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 445

LEVEL 1

23

5%

LEVEL 2

77

17%

LEVEL 3

161

36%

LEVEL 4

184

41%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 32

LEVEL 1

16

50%

LEVEL 2

12

38%

LEVEL 3

2

6%

LEVEL 4

2

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

5
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 40

LEVEL 1

24

60%

LEVEL 2

11

28%

LEVEL 3

4

10%

LEVEL 4

1

3%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

383
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 524

LEVEL 1

36

7%

LEVEL 2

105

20%

LEVEL 3

163

31%

LEVEL 4

220

42%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

348
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 480

LEVEL 1

45

9%

LEVEL 2

87

18%

LEVEL 3

164

34%

LEVEL 4

184

38%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

3
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

2

29%

LEVEL 2

2

29%

LEVEL 3

1

14%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

2
40%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

1

20%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

355
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 464

LEVEL 1

26

6%

LEVEL 2

83

18%

LEVEL 3

143

31%

LEVEL 4

212

46%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

308
77%
TOTAL TESTED: 398

LEVEL 1

26

7%

LEVEL 2

64

16%

LEVEL 3

137

34%

LEVEL 4

171

43%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

31
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 67

LEVEL 1

12

18%

LEVEL 2

24

36%

LEVEL 3

21

31%

LEVEL 4

10

15%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

42
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 87

LEVEL 1

21

24%

LEVEL 2

24

28%

LEVEL 3

28

32%

LEVEL 4

14

16%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.