TESAGO ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

147
78%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

14

7%

LEVEL 2

27

14%

LEVEL 3

41

22%

LEVEL 4

106

56%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

163
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 192

LEVEL 1

11

6%

LEVEL 2

18

9%

LEVEL 3

45

23%

LEVEL 4

118

61%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

61
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 86

LEVEL 1

6

7%

LEVEL 2

19

22%

LEVEL 3

20

23%

LEVEL 4

41

48%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

72
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 85

LEVEL 1

5

6%

LEVEL 2

8

9%

LEVEL 3

22

26%

LEVEL 4

50

59%

MALE

PROFICIENT

86
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 102

LEVEL 1

8

8%

LEVEL 2

8

8%

LEVEL 3

21

21%

LEVEL 4

65

64%

MALE

PROFICIENT

91
85%
TOTAL TESTED: 107

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

10

9%

LEVEL 3

23

21%

LEVEL 4

68

64%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

63%

LEVEL 4

3

38%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

1

9%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

1

9%

LEVEL 4

6

55%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

59
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 64

LEVEL 1

1

2%

LEVEL 2

4

6%

LEVEL 3

5

8%

LEVEL 4

54

84%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

58
98%
TOTAL TESTED: 59

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

2%

LEVEL 3

6

10%

LEVEL 4

52

88%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

74
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

11

10%

LEVEL 2

21

20%

LEVEL 3

30

28%

LEVEL 4

44

42%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

90
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 113

LEVEL 1

9

8%

LEVEL 2

14

12%

LEVEL 3

35

31%

LEVEL 4

55

49%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

145
84%
TOTAL TESTED: 172

LEVEL 1

6

3%

LEVEL 2

21

12%

LEVEL 3

40

23%

LEVEL 4

105

61%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

159
92%
TOTAL TESTED: 173

LEVEL 1

3

2%

LEVEL 2

11

6%

LEVEL 3

42

24%

LEVEL 4

117

68%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

2
13%
TOTAL TESTED: 16

LEVEL 1

8

50%

LEVEL 2

6

38%

LEVEL 3

1

6%

LEVEL 4

1

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

4
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 19

LEVEL 1

8

42%

LEVEL 2

7

37%

LEVEL 3

3

16%

LEVEL 4

1

5%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

142
80%
TOTAL TESTED: 177

LEVEL 1

12

7%

LEVEL 2

23

13%

LEVEL 3

38

21%

LEVEL 4

104

59%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

156
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 178

LEVEL 1

7

4%

LEVEL 2

15

8%

LEVEL 3

40

22%

LEVEL 4

116

65%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

5
45%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

2

18%

LEVEL 2

4

36%

LEVEL 3

3

27%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

7
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

3

21%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

2

14%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.