Skip to Content
Main content

PASHLEY ELEMENTARY SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

134
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

16

8%

LEVEL 2

45

23%

LEVEL 3

77

39%

LEVEL 4

57

29%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

137
63%
TOTAL TESTED: 217

LEVEL 1

27

12%

LEVEL 2

53

24%

LEVEL 3

82

38%

LEVEL 4

55

25%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

76
72%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

6

6%

LEVEL 2

23

22%

LEVEL 3

41

39%

LEVEL 4

35

33%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

74
66%
TOTAL TESTED: 112

LEVEL 1

11

10%

LEVEL 2

27

24%

LEVEL 3

43

38%

LEVEL 4

31

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

58
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 90

LEVEL 1

10

11%

LEVEL 2

22

24%

LEVEL 3

36

40%

LEVEL 4

22

24%

MALE

PROFICIENT

63
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 105

LEVEL 1

16

15%

LEVEL 2

26

25%

LEVEL 3

39

37%

LEVEL 4

24

23%

BY RACE AND ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

7
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

5

63%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

5

42%

LEVEL 4

7

58%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

WHITE

PROFICIENT

124
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 182

LEVEL 1

16

9%

LEVEL 2

42

23%

LEVEL 3

73

40%

LEVEL 4

51

28%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

120
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 195

LEVEL 1

25

13%

LEVEL 2

50

26%

LEVEL 3

73

37%

LEVEL 4

47

24%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

125
74%
TOTAL TESTED: 169

LEVEL 1

10

6%

LEVEL 2

34

20%

LEVEL 3

71

42%

LEVEL 4

54

32%

GENERAL EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

128
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 188

LEVEL 1

14

7%

LEVEL 2

46

24%

LEVEL 3

77

41%

LEVEL 4

51

27%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
35%
TOTAL TESTED: 26

LEVEL 1

6

23%

LEVEL 2

11

42%

LEVEL 3

6

23%

LEVEL 4

3

12%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
31%
TOTAL TESTED: 29

LEVEL 1

13

45%

LEVEL 2

7

24%

LEVEL 3

5

17%

LEVEL 4

4

14%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNER

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

114
73%
TOTAL TESTED: 157

LEVEL 1

12

8%

LEVEL 2

31

20%

LEVEL 3

61

39%

LEVEL 4

53

34%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

113
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 168

LEVEL 1

16

10%

LEVEL 2

39

23%

LEVEL 3

64

38%

LEVEL 4

49

29%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

20
53%
TOTAL TESTED: 38

LEVEL 1

4

11%

LEVEL 2

14

37%

LEVEL 3

16

42%

LEVEL 4

4

11%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

24
49%
TOTAL TESTED: 49

LEVEL 1

11

22%

LEVEL 2

14

29%

LEVEL 3

18

37%

LEVEL 4

6

12%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

133
70%
TOTAL TESTED: 190

LEVEL 1

15

8%

LEVEL 2

42

22%

LEVEL 3

76

40%

LEVEL 4

57

30%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

1
20%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

1

20%

LEVEL 2

3

60%

LEVEL 3

1

20%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.