RICHARD H O'ROURKE MIDDLE SCHOOL GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

356
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 575

LEVEL 1

63

11%

LEVEL 2

156

27%

LEVEL 3

205

36%

LEVEL 4

151

26%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

376
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 583

LEVEL 1

62

11%

LEVEL 2

145

25%

LEVEL 3

209

36%

LEVEL 4

167

29%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

171
59%
TOTAL TESTED: 291

LEVEL 1

32

11%

LEVEL 2

88

30%

LEVEL 3

107

37%

LEVEL 4

64

22%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

202
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 311

LEVEL 1

32

10%

LEVEL 2

77

25%

LEVEL 3

115

37%

LEVEL 4

87

28%

MALE

PROFICIENT

185
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 284

LEVEL 1

31

11%

LEVEL 2

68

24%

LEVEL 3

98

35%

LEVEL 4

87

31%

MALE

PROFICIENT

174
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 272

LEVEL 1

30

11%

LEVEL 2

68

25%

LEVEL 3

94

35%

LEVEL 4

80

29%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

8
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

4

33%

LEVEL 3

6

50%

LEVEL 4

2

17%

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

12
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

1

6%

LEVEL 2

4

24%

LEVEL 3

7

41%

LEVEL 4

5

29%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

0
TOTAL TESTED: 0

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

7
88%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

1

13%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

4

50%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

9
100%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

0

0%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

6

67%

LEVEL 4

3

33%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

331
62%
TOTAL TESTED: 535

LEVEL 1

58

11%

LEVEL 2

146

27%

LEVEL 3

190

36%

LEVEL 4

141

26%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

345
64%
TOTAL TESTED: 536

LEVEL 1

56

10%

LEVEL 2

135

25%

LEVEL 3

191

36%

LEVEL 4

154

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

4
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 11

LEVEL 1

4

36%

LEVEL 2

3

27%

LEVEL 3

2

18%

LEVEL 4

2

18%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
38%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

3

38%

LEVEL 2

2

25%

LEVEL 3

3

38%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

6
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 9

LEVEL 1

1

11%

LEVEL 2

2

22%

LEVEL 3

4

44%

LEVEL 4

2

22%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

7
54%
TOTAL TESTED: 13

LEVEL 1

2

15%

LEVEL 2

4

31%

LEVEL 3

2

15%

LEVEL 4

5

38%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

341
68%
TOTAL TESTED: 504

LEVEL 1

31

6%

LEVEL 2

132

26%

LEVEL 3

194

38%

LEVEL 4

147

29%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

354
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 502

LEVEL 1

26

5%

LEVEL 2

122

24%

LEVEL 3

192

38%

LEVEL 4

162

32%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

15
21%
TOTAL TESTED: 71

LEVEL 1

32

45%

LEVEL 2

24

34%

LEVEL 3

11

15%

LEVEL 4

4

6%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

22
27%
TOTAL TESTED: 81

LEVEL 1

36

44%

LEVEL 2

23

28%

LEVEL 3

17

21%

LEVEL 4

5

6%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

309
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 472

LEVEL 1

40

8%

LEVEL 2

123

26%

LEVEL 3

180

38%

LEVEL 4

129

27%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

330
69%
TOTAL TESTED: 477

LEVEL 1

43

9%

LEVEL 2

104

22%

LEVEL 3

183

38%

LEVEL 4

147

31%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

47
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 103

LEVEL 1

23

22%

LEVEL 2

33

32%

LEVEL 3

25

24%

LEVEL 4

22

21%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

46
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 106

LEVEL 1

19

18%

LEVEL 2

41

39%

LEVEL 3

26

25%

LEVEL 4

20

19%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.