POTSDAM CSD GRADES 3-8 MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENT DATA

The grades 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessments measure the higher learning standards that were adopted by the State Board of Regents in 2010, which more accurately reflect students' progress toward college and career readiness. Data are available statewide and at the county, district, and school level.

Data available on this site are based on those reported by schools and districts to the State as of July 25, 2019 via the Student Information Repository System (SIRS). The New York State School Report Card 3-8 English Language Arts (ELA) and mathematics assessment data will be based on those data reported as of the final school year reporting deadline.

For more information and additional files, please view the NYSED press release

Assessment Data - Glossary of Terms | Assessment Data - Business Rules

2018

2019

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

243
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 567

LEVEL 1

154

27%

LEVEL 2

170

30%

LEVEL 3

144

25%

LEVEL 4

99

17%

ALL STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

250
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 524

LEVEL 1

134

26%

LEVEL 2

140

27%

LEVEL 3

146

28%

LEVEL 4

104

20%

BY GENDER

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

116
46%
TOTAL TESTED: 254

LEVEL 1

62

24%

LEVEL 2

76

30%

LEVEL 3

66

26%

LEVEL 4

50

20%

FEMALE

PROFICIENT

105
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 220

LEVEL 1

49

22%

LEVEL 2

66

30%

LEVEL 3

59

27%

LEVEL 4

46

21%

MALE

PROFICIENT

127
41%
TOTAL TESTED: 313

LEVEL 1

92

29%

LEVEL 2

94

30%

LEVEL 3

78

25%

LEVEL 4

49

16%

MALE

PROFICIENT

145
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 304

LEVEL 1

85

28%

LEVEL 2

74

24%

LEVEL 3

87

29%

LEVEL 4

58

19%

BY ETHNICITY

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MULTIRACIAL

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

AMERICAN INDIAN OR ALASKA NATIVE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

10
67%
TOTAL TESTED: 15

LEVEL 1

3

20%

LEVEL 2

2

13%

LEVEL 3

6

40%

LEVEL 4

4

27%

ASIAN OR NATIVE HAWAIIAN/OTHER PACIFIC ISLANDER

PROFICIENT

11
65%
TOTAL TESTED: 17

LEVEL 1

5

29%

LEVEL 2

1

6%

LEVEL 3

5

29%

LEVEL 4

6

35%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

221
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 528

LEVEL 1

144

27%

LEVEL 2

163

31%

LEVEL 3

130

25%

LEVEL 4

91

17%

WHITE

PROFICIENT

228
47%
TOTAL TESTED: 482

LEVEL 1

122

25%

LEVEL 2

132

27%

LEVEL 3

131

27%

LEVEL 4

97

20%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

5
71%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

1

14%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

3

43%

LEVEL 4

2

29%

BLACK OR AFRICAN AMERICAN

PROFICIENT

3
60%
TOTAL TESTED: 5

LEVEL 1

2

40%

LEVEL 2

0

0%

LEVEL 3

2

40%

LEVEL 4

1

20%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

3
30%
TOTAL TESTED: 10

LEVEL 1

5

50%

LEVEL 2

2

20%

LEVEL 3

2

20%

LEVEL 4

1

10%

HISPANIC OR LATINO

PROFICIENT

5
36%
TOTAL TESTED: 14

LEVEL 1

4

29%

LEVEL 2

5

36%

LEVEL 3

5

36%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

OTHER GROUPS

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

237
50%
TOTAL TESTED: 478

LEVEL 1

89

19%

LEVEL 2

152

32%

LEVEL 3

140

29%

LEVEL 4

97

20%

GENERAL-EDUCATION STUDENTS

PROFICIENT

241
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 433

LEVEL 1

62

14%

LEVEL 2

130

30%

LEVEL 3

138

32%

LEVEL 4

103

24%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

6
7%
TOTAL TESTED: 89

LEVEL 1

65

73%

LEVEL 2

18

20%

LEVEL 3

4

4%

LEVEL 4

2

2%

STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

PROFICIENT

9
10%
TOTAL TESTED: 91

LEVEL 1

72

79%

LEVEL 2

10

11%

LEVEL 3

8

9%

LEVEL 4

1

1%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

242
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 561

LEVEL 1

151

27%

LEVEL 2

168

30%

LEVEL 3

143

25%

LEVEL 4

99

18%

NON-ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

245
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 512

LEVEL 1

129

25%

LEVEL 2

138

27%

LEVEL 3

144

28%

LEVEL 4

101

20%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

1
17%
TOTAL TESTED: 6

LEVEL 1

3

50%

LEVEL 2

2

33%

LEVEL 3

1

17%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS

PROFICIENT

5
42%
TOTAL TESTED: 12

LEVEL 1

5

42%

LEVEL 2

2

17%

LEVEL 3

2

17%

LEVEL 4

3

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

184
56%
TOTAL TESTED: 331

LEVEL 1

51

15%

LEVEL 2

96

29%

LEVEL 3

101

31%

LEVEL 4

83

25%

NOT ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

191
61%
TOTAL TESTED: 315

LEVEL 1

46

15%

LEVEL 2

78

25%

LEVEL 3

108

34%

LEVEL 4

83

26%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 236

LEVEL 1

103

44%

LEVEL 2

74

31%

LEVEL 3

43

18%

LEVEL 4

16

7%

ECONOMICALLY DISADVANTAGED

PROFICIENT

59
28%
TOTAL TESTED: 209

LEVEL 1

88

42%

LEVEL 2

62

30%

LEVEL 3

38

18%

LEVEL 4

21

10%

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

MIGRANT

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT IN FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

FOSTER CARE

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS NOT IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

PARENTS IN ARMED FORCES

PROFICIENT

TOTAL TESTED: —

LEVEL 1

LEVEL 2

LEVEL 3

LEVEL 4

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

243
43%
TOTAL TESTED: 560

LEVEL 1

148

26%

LEVEL 2

169

30%

LEVEL 3

144

26%

LEVEL 4

99

18%

NOT HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

248
48%
TOTAL TESTED: 516

LEVEL 1

133

26%

LEVEL 2

135

26%

LEVEL 3

144

28%

LEVEL 4

104

20%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

0
0%
TOTAL TESTED: 7

LEVEL 1

6

86%

LEVEL 2

1

14%

LEVEL 3

0

0%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

HOMELESS

PROFICIENT

2
25%
TOTAL TESTED: 8

LEVEL 1

1

13%

LEVEL 2

5

63%

LEVEL 3

2

25%

LEVEL 4

0

0%

Top
  1. You can do a side-by-side comparison of the same dataset between two or three location and/or years. There are two ways to accomplish this.

    1. Use the quick comparisons section for the most common options.
    2. Create a custom comparison, by adding this location to the comparison engine using the + button.

  2. If you're creating a custom comparison, you'll need to navigate to this report for another location and/or year and use the + icon on that page to add it to the comparison engine.